Some people think the main benefit of international cooperation is in the protection of the environment while others think that the main benefits are in the world business Discuss both views and give your opinion

Essay topics:

Some people think the main benefit of international cooperation is in the protection of the environment, while others think that the main benefits are in the world business. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

While some people believe that coordination between countries could be witnessed mostly in preservation of the environment, while others think it benefits the global economy. The impacts on both sectors will be elaborated below.
One the one hand, environmental issue is often prioritised among nations when it comes to cooperation among countries. The first rationale is that deterioration of the natural environment has happened at a faster pace than ever. Due to this, lives of billions of people as well as their livelihood are placed at risk. That is why the issue is of international concern nowsaday. In addition, conferences and enviromental programmes to discuss with the hope of new solutions could be introduced to cope with the phenomenon. Some positive consequences are gained from such attemps, as international political leaders has come to certain agreements to reduce the carbon emission, thereby alliviating the negative impact on the planet.
Apart from conservation of the ecosystem, nations also share mutual interests in economic development. International economic partnerships has been the norm in the last decades. Countries with different economic structures joining in special economic community to complement each other has become the norm for the time being. For instance, Viet Nam, Japan and other several nations are negotiating to establish new partnership. This is believed to combine the low-cost labor and argircultural strength of Viet Nam and the huge market of Japan. In addition, economic coordination could appear in form of financial support from developed to underdeveloped countries. In this case, the richer nation would finance the construction of infrastructure and facilities which are necessary for growth of the recipient country. In return, the country receiving funding would accept companies from the donor country to expand to its domestic market.
In sum, even though evironmental problem is of importance for international partnerships, the role of economic relationship is also significant. In my opinion, both issues are of equally important, since they guarantee the survival and prosperity of humankind.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-06-07 Lê Khánh Diệp 84 view
2023-02-06 tieuquynh 89 view
2022-09-12 Charles Le 84 view
2022-06-08 Slytherin 89 view
2022-04-29 Josie-e3 56 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 819, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ry for growth of the recipient country. In return, the country receiving funding w...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...try to expand to its domestic market. In sum, even though evironmental problem i...
^^
Line 4, column 146, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...nomic relationship is also significant. In my opinion, both issues are of equally ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, so, well, while, apart from, for instance, in addition, as well as, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1839.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.62385321101 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1969548258 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611620795107 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 586.8 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.7932974657 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.166666667 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1666666667 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.44444444444 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136845003001 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0358489116812 0.084324248473 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0520760972025 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0941054980296 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0738807538376 0.056905535591 130% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.02 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.28 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 78.4519038076 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.