Many people continue to use cars and motorcycles even though they know that they are bad for the environment.
Why is this? What can be done to reduce the use of these vehicles?
Nowadays, communities are persistently utilising vehicles despite being cognizant of their negative effects on the environment. In this essay, I would like to identify the causes of this situation and propose some corresponding solutions.
Probably the main factor is the accessibility and comfort of automobiles and motor vehicles in urban areas. In other words, the possession of a vehicle provides availability and convenience for both the passenger and the driver. To exemplify this, when it is required to commute, employees can drive comfortably and peacefully without complying with specific time schedules of the public transportation system. Furthermore, drivers can cover a longer distance in a shorter amount of time because they can control the acceleration and deceleration of their vehicle, hence avoiding lengthy and frustrating journeys. Another contributing factor to this is safety concerns that are identified as a barrier to people using the public transportation system. For instance, people fear the criminal behaviour a passenger might commit, such as theft and pickpocketing due to the anonymity, openness and overcrowding of the public transportation system. Consequently, the public avoids using buses or trains as a means of transport and public services find it strenuous to control and monitor such vast systems.
Regarding potential solutions, probably the main remedy would be to invest more in transport infrastructure. This can be attained through ameliorating railway systems and initiating more stations in inaccessible rural areas. Moreover, improve bus services by employing conductors who prevent overcrowding and anti-social behaviour. Another solution is to make cheaper and more standardised fares. Therefore, if ticket prices are reduced, then people will find it more affordable than petrol. the final solution might be to encourage people to cycle more since it is not only beneficial for the environment but also for an individual’s health. This can be achieved by raising awareness and initiating campaigns about the advantages of cycling in conserving energy and non-renewable resources which are constantly consumed by car drivers. As a result, the public will be motivated to use public transport to commute instead of cars and motorcycles and reduce the rate of harmful emissions.
In conclusion, the majority of people favour the utilization of personal automobiles due to various reasons. However, possible solutions would involve improving transport infrastructure, reducing costs and raising awareness of the negative effects of commuting by car and motor vehicles.
- A big salary is much more important than job satisfaction Do you agree or disagree 11
- Today different types of robots are being developed which can serve as friends help at work and at home Is this a positive or negative development 78
- It is universally accepted that eating too much sugar has negative effects on peoples health Therefore some believe that governments should control the amount of sugar people consume Others think it is the responsibility of an individual to control their 84
- Big salary is much more important than job satisfaction Do you agree or disagree 67
- Many people continue to use cars and motorcycles even though they know that they are bad for the environment Why is this What can be done to reduce the use of these vehicles 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 493, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...ll find it more affordable than petrol. the final solution might be to encourage pe...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, hence, however, if, moreover, regarding, so, then, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 10.4138276553 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2237.0 1615.20841683 138% => OK
No of words: 390.0 315.596192385 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.7358974359 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44391917772 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22784666346 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 176.041082164 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579487179487 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 710.1 506.74238477 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.7041993444 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.736842105 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5263157895 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.15789473684 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22428439074 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0599869315028 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0401358804874 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115242731809 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0480312191232 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.01 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.5 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 145.0 78.4519038076 185% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.