Some people believe that teenagers should be required to do unpaid community work in their free time. This can benefit teenagers and the community as well. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Youths should be involved voluntarily in social activities during leisure time, as this provides positive impacts on both society and those young people involved in it. I agree with this notion since it builds the foundation for political involvement and also expands personal experience regarding problem-solving and decision-making.
Nowadays, youths are greatly developing an interest towards politics. Aged, tested, and failed political leaders are spreading frustration and anger among youth. Involvement in social work helps to develop leadership capacity, and also leaves positive impacts on that community. Moreover, this sort of participation helps to recognize the youth in that community, and during election time it may create positive attributes towards young social activists. For instance, in the recently happened local-level election in Nepal, those youths who were previously involved in social activities gained popularity and many of them were elected at the local level. Involvement in these kinds of activities motivates youths to move forward in politics.
Participation in community work enriches the capacity of youth to deal with real-world problems of decision-making in their day-to-day life. Social works such as proper maintenance of health, sanitation, security and so on in society need proper decision and coordination. Involvement in these types of issues nourishes the personal skill development in youth. Experience is directly correlated with participation. For example, recent studies concluded that teenagers who are involved in community work have greater decision-making and skills coordination.
In conclusion, participation in social activities helps to motivate youth to become successful political leaders and it also assists in personal capacity development. So, I strongly agree that young people should be involved in community development without any wages or salary also.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-17 | fdsugb22 | view | |
| 2023-06-21 | shwetarani | 56 | view |
| 2023-05-08 | tmai41587 | view | |
| 2023-02-05 | katyhot1 | view | |
| 2022-12-20 | jahidhumayun@gmail.com | 67 | view |
- The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after five years
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture many people around the world still go hungry Why is this the case What can be done about this problem 56
- The table shows the number of mobile phones and personal computers per 1000 people in 2003 in 6 different counties Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- Some people believe that professionals such as doctors and engineers should be required to work in the country where they did their training Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish Discuss both these views and give your 73
- The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after five years
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 279, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...development without any wages or salary also.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, sort of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.3376753507 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1654.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.97111913357 5.12529762239 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18080658474 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.559566787004 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 526.5 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.8878927085 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.266666667 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4666666667 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.86666666667 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114812198987 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0410872937776 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0519422116836 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0832873972461 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0347328934825 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.83 50.2224549098 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.9 11.3001002004 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.35 12.4159519038 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.77 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.