Museums and art galleries should concentrate on works that show history and culture of their own country rather than works of the other parts in the world. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Museums and art galleries have played a significant role in preserving and conveying historical values. Whereas some people suggest that they should focus on domestic artworks, I side with those who suggest that exotic masterpieces should also be presented.
On the one hand, it is argued that a local museum should be a place which honours the historical values of the land where it is located. Conspicuously containing archival stories of a nation, works of art show dwellers the periods of glory and decline that their predecessors experienced, which in turn instils and nurtures patriotism of the people as well as promotes a sense of their national pride. Aside from serving educational purposes, art displays also contribute to the preservation of indigenous culture and customs. For example, traditional crafts, costumes and ways of life of several minorities on the verge of cultural assimilation with the majorities are moderately obsolete in modern society; and yet they now can be saved behind glass.
On the other hand, I support the idea of exposing local people to masterpieces that originated from foreign lands. Firstly, bringing along with them the mindsets as well as directly connecting to historical events of the land where they stemmed from, foreign artworks offer the locals a chance to broaden their horizon by revealing a new vision of the world from historical and cultural aspects. Secondly, the number of people paying a visit to museums and art galleries has gradually decreased thus adding exotic works would help attract more visitors to the places. Finally, by opening up an opportunity to enjoy and sense masterpieces made by worldwide artists like Van Gogh and Leonardo da Vinci, museums will greatly enrich local people’s social life.
In conclusion, it is my firm conviction that coupled with local exhibits, museums and art halls should also place an equal emphasis on foreign pieces of art.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-06 | vuhungbo | 84 | view |
| 2022-11-16 | chaupnh | 84 | view |
| 2022-08-18 | baokhuyen759 | 67 | view |
| 2022-07-18 | doquytuan | 67 | view |
| 2022-01-18 | Huyenlbg87 | 89 | view |
- Increasing travels between countries enable people to learn different cultures or to increase tension between people from different countries 90
- Museums and art galleries should concentrate on works that show history and culture of their own country rather than works of the other parts in the world To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Internet technology means people do not need to travel to foreign countries to understand how others live To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- In the modern world it is possible to shop work and communicate with people via the internet and live without any face to face contact with others Is this a positive or negative development 89
- In today s world of advanced science and technology we still greatly value our artists such as musicians painters and writers What can arts tell us about life that science and technology cannot 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, thus, well, whereas, for example, in conclusion, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1623.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21864951768 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78121851628 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601286173633 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 503.1 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.8220362329 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.545454545 106.682146367 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.2727272727 20.7667163134 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.7272727273 7.06120827912 180% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176374582542 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0652423952318 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0369709173314 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105961578081 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0158145334141 0.056905535591 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.0946893788 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 50.2224549098 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.15 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.