Some people think that in this modern world, getting old is entirely bad. However, other people believe that the life of old people is much better now than it was in the past.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
In several people's viewpoint, in modern era, getting old is more beneficial, while others believe that elderlies' life would be faced new problems that could harm them. There are reasonable points of debates on both sides which will be elucidated more below.
On the one hand, opponents of negative side of being old argue that elderly's life would be guarantee than past where most countries have established strict regulations for the pension funds. Apparently, the financial incentives for retiree would be main income for elderly to live, so that, their life guarantee is likely kept for a long time. Moreover, old people's life is significantly supported by the presence of up-to-date medical facilities. In line with effective treatments, elderly's diseases would be medicated and prevented as fast as possible with a number of excellent doctors and the supporting facilities. As a result, their life expectancy possibly increase.
On the other hand, though, proponents of old people' life which might be worse believe that oldsters would face problems on increasing competitive job. Regarding competing with young generations, if old people have lack of prominant skills; creative and innovative thinking; problem solving, and decision-making, they will be eliminated from the job and becoming pension earlier. In addition, dealing with high-tech devices seems to be difficult owing to physical endurance. On the basis of vulnerable condition (eye diseases and fragile bones), time productivity of elderly is likely reduced when they have occassions requiring utilisation of electronic devices such as computer or smartphone.
In summary, it appears to me that increasing the number of people's age may induce several drawbacks; growth of competitive job and lack of physical endurace. This is as long as the medical facilities could prevent the elderly's condition.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-27 | bngoc1222 | 89 | view |
| 2022-12-09 | akmalfikri1 | 89 | view |
| 2022-12-09 | akmalfikri1 | 89 | view |
| 2021-07-27 | rutvik6 | 61 | view |
| 2021-07-24 | Chinkiarora | 78 | view |
- Some people think that in this modern world getting old is entirely bad However other people believe that the life of old people is much better now than it was in the past Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
- It is always wrong to keep animals in captivity for instance in zoos How far do you share this view 78
- Some people think that in this modern world getting old is entirely bad However other people believe that the life of old people is much better now than it was in the past Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
- Alternative energy source that use the natural power of the wind waves and sun are too expensive and complicated to replace the coal oil and gas that we use to power our cities and transport To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 84
- Alternative energy source that use the natural power of the wind waves and sun are too expensive and complicated to replace the coal oil and gas that we use to power our cities and transport To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 12, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
In several peoples viewpoint, in modern era, getting old i...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, while, in addition, in summary, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1580.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48611111111 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92834138313 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611111111111 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.2805359371 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.538461538 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1538461538 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1842516063 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0708933641929 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0726973549382 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119438766505 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0397592037383 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.