The chart below gives information about how families in one country spent their weekly income in 1968 and in 2018.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
The bar chart depicts the percentage of weekly salary which is spent in distinct categories by families in the period from 1968 to 2018.
Overall, it can be observed initially that Food was likely to be spent the most in 1968, compared to other purposes. However, the result seemed different when it came to in 2018 when leisure was the category which had been spent predominately of all other categories.
It was immediately apparented that by 1968, food was reached a peak of the chart, with about 35%, while the figure for fuel and power was registered at the lowest rate, with just around 7%. Families also prefered invest their income earned in a week to housing with the proportion of 10% which was exceeded personal goods and transport by 3%, at 7% of the figures. Household goods and personal goods were spent equally at 7% of the total weekly income.
On the other hand, in the period of the time by 2018, the data of leisure activity was the highest, about 23% of the salary. Moreover, leisure activity also exceeded food category by 6% with respective figures being to 23% and 17%. Fuel and power was asserted to be the lowest figure, with just around 4%, and the same figure for personal goods was recorded in 2018.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-20 | hahoaan | 84 | view |
| 2024-03-27 | minhnhat2002 | 78 | view |
| 2024-03-27 | minhnhat2002 | 84 | view |
| 2024-03-27 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
| 2024-03-25 | andreahoangbp | 60 | view |
- Some people think that large impressive buildings are important for a city Others believe that the money should be spent on improving schools and hospitals Discuss both views and give your own opinion 61
- The table shows forested land in millions of hectares in different parts of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities 67
- The maps show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development 84
- Some people think that large impressive buildings are important for a city Others believe that the money should be spent on improving schools and hospitals Discuss both views and give your own opinion 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, moreover, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1019.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 218.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67431192661 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37668248717 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522935779817 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 308.7 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.3514394476 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.222222222 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2222222222 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 5.23603664747 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131370337845 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0644462673539 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0462352241155 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0959345480499 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0519111989816 0.0819641961636 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.