Countries with a long average working time are more economically successful than those countries which do not have a long working time. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some individuals contend that a prolonged average working hours of citizens could allow the state to have better economic development compared with nations that have shorter office hours. I completely agree with this argument.
To begin with, longer office hours can be beneficial to the cities. Citizenry staying in the workplace for a longer time will have a higher salary. Many companies pay workers according to their working time, so those who work for longer or even stay overnight in the office can earn more. For example, nurses in the US can have triple the hourly wage rate than originally if they work extra hours. Higher salaries of city dwellers imply that they have more savings, spending more on consumer goods like food, electronic gadgets, and clothing. Thus, the expenditure of citizens will go to the companies so it will reinvest their income into society. Consequently, the state will have more thriving economic growth due to the huge consumer spending.
In addition, longer working hours can train citizens’ durability and this can motivate them to be more hard-working. For example, Hong Kong is one of the cities with the longest working hours in the world, rated as one of the most competitive cities in the world. People who live in Hong Kong already get used to long working hours and overtime working is so common there. Therefore, they treat 10 hours working as a normal situation so civilians there are so hard working. Working overnight is even culture in some of the financial industries in Hong Kong such as investment banking and audit. It is the endurable personality of the residents trained through a decade that makes Hong Kong an international financial center, being one of the most economically developed places.
In conclusion, there are many advantages in terms of economic boosting for the citizenry to stay longer in the workplace so I totally agree that long working hours can make a state more economically competitive.
- The pictures below show the process of making clothes from recycled plastic bottles Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- Countries with a long average working time are more economically successful than those countries which do not have a long working time To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Countries with a long average working time are more economically successful than those countries which do not have a long working time To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The tables below provide information about the consumption and production of potatoes in five parts of the world in 2006 73
- More children in developed countries are becoming overweight This is a serious problem for wealthy countries Discuss some causes and effects of this problem 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 511, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...g. Working overnight is even culture in some of the financial industries in Hong Kong such ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, if, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1647.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05214723926 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68181151255 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527607361963 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 528.3 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8897322132 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.9375 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.375 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232922674262 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0818664240655 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0493175055976 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156976237661 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0195408963959 0.056905535591 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.