Some people think that social networking sites have a huge negative impact on both individuals and society. To what extent do you agree or disagree
It is believed that the Internet can bring bad effects on people and society. While this statement might be true, from my point of view, I would argue that social networking sites can offer both advantages and disadvantages.
On the one hand, for individuals and society, social media can be useful in their daily life. Firstly, social media is very convenient. They can access the internet every time and everywhere to search for their daily needs such as finding the nearest restaurant, hospital, or where to buy the thing they need. Secondly, the internet could help people to become a better version of themselves. They can take advantage of the internet for education purposes, find new knowledge, search for study materials, and applications, or learn new things without paying money.
On the other hand, social networking sites also have some drawbacks. If people spend too much time on the internet, they will get addicted and can not stop using them. Not only that, they might become lazy, and it can also cause some mental and physical health problems such as stress, depression, short-sightedness, or humpbackness. Another reason is that if people depend too much on social media, they may not thinking, be creative, or brainstorm, and a society can not develop with many people like that. So using social media too much could lead to many problems.
To conclude, while depending on social networking sites can bring bad effects, I still believe that social media could have greater benefits to our life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-31 | trpg143 | view | |
| 2024-07-31 | trpg143 | view | |
| 2023-06-28 | Baobestfriend | 67 | view |
| 2023-01-04 | truong3011 | 61 | view |
| 2023-01-03 | truong3011 | 56 | view |
- Task 1 The chart below shows the percentage of people born in and outside of Australia living in cities towns and rural areas in 1950 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features of the graph and make comparisons where r 84
- Task 1 The graph below shows the hours of teaching per year done by each teacher in four different countries in 2001 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Tourists office 67
- Comparison of energy production 67
- Annual rice production 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, while, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 41.998997996 48% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1275.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 252.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05952380952 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65099265007 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.575396825397 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 378.0 506.74238477 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 0.809619238477 865% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.2400391805 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.0769230769 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3846153846 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.15384615385 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161250607253 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0701183239374 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0648578040877 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113206882644 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0408605705065 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 78.4519038076 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.