Task 1: The graph below shows the hours of teaching per year done by each teacher in four different countries in 2001. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The given chart provides a comparison of the number of teaching hours in 4 different countries (Japan, Spain, Ireland, and the USA) in the year 2001.
From an overall perspective, it is evident that upper-secondary has the highest teaching hours in the four countries.
Looking at the chart for more details, it can be seen that, in Japan, the number of teaching hours in Upper-secondary was the highest, about 700. The figures for Lower-Secondary and Primary were lower, at precisely 600, respectively. In Spain, the figure for Upper-Secondary was highest, at nearly 1000, while the figures for Lower-Secondary and Primary were lower, and shared the number with the figure for
that in Japan.
For the rest of the chart, in Ireland, the teacher spent about 800 hours in Lower-Secondary, and spent over 600 and precisely 600 for Upper-Secondary, and Primary, respectively. The number of teaching hours in Upper-Secondary was the highest in the USA and among the four countries, at about 1100. In addition, the figures for Lower-Seondary were lower, over 1000. The figure for Primary, however, accounted for the lowest number, about 900.
- Task 1 The chart below shows the percentage of people born in and outside of Australia living in cities towns and rural areas in 1950 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features of the graph and make comparisons where r 84
- Annual rice production 67
- How sugar is produced from sugar cane
- Comparison of energy production 67
- Male and female olympics participants 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, second, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 957.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20108695652 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24961372577 2.65546596893 122% => OK
Unique words: 83.0 106.607317073 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.451086956522 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 286.2 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 11.0 3.36585365854 327% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.148631527 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.333333333 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4444444444 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.44444444444 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0878543783227 0.215688989381 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0551339474874 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.069971901469 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0980530072612 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0782064383856 0.0819641961636 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.