Task 2. An increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment. Why is this the case, and what solutions are possible?
It is incontrovertible that the incontrollable increase in the number of consumer products has led to several environmental consequences, especially ecological crisis. While this phenomenon can be ascribed to several reasons, I would argue that several measures can be also employed to tackle the problem.
The environmental impacts resulting from the excessive production of consumer products can be attributed to two primary reasons. Firstly, the ever-growing demand for different forms of transportation and heavy industries has led to the requirement for the navigation of more sources of fuel. Consequently, mineral extraction has been haphazardly promoted, causing environmental degradation in many parts of the world. Although advances in technologies have been broadly employed in the fabrication of green energy sources, the production of energy storage devices always requires the utilization of metallic minerals such as cobalt or lithium, which lead to massive habitat destruction across the world. Secondly, the usage of consumer products also stimulates the release of toxic waste, which possessed slow biodegradability. These contaminants are also constituted of complex chemical properties, which can strongly interact and damage the organisms in aqueous sources, consequently jeopardizing the aquatic ecosystems and human health.
Fortunately, national and local authorities can implement different policies to attenuate the release of these harmful products into the environment. In terms of consumption regulations, it is true that several consumer goods such as televisions, phones, or cars, can be made obsolete quickly. Hence, improvements in manufacturing processes should be prioritized to prolong the period of usability of these products. From the perspective of recycling, it is also necessary to introduce restriction on the release of toxic products, such as plastic into the environment. Instead, technological breakthroughs need to be promoted to introduce more recycling plans for each household and industrial product. If more goods can be reused, then there will be less depletion of natural resources.
In conclusion, it is obvious that ecological destruction stemming from uncontrolled consumption is one of the most serious problems for society. Thus, decreasing consumption and employing more recycling campaigns need to be ubiquitously expanded.
- Task 2 Crimes committed by young people are increasing in major cities throughout the world Discuss the causes and how to solve this problem 80
- Task 1 The chart shows the percentage of males and females who were overweight in Australia from 1980 to 2010
- Nowadays people depend on technology for leisure activities Is this a positive or negative development 89
- Task 2 In some countries if people need to find work they have to move away from their families and their friends Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 73
- Task 1 The chart shows the percentage of males and females who were overweight in Australia from 1980 to 2010
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, hence, if, second, secondly, so, then, thus, while, in conclusion, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2050.0 1615.20841683 127% => OK
No of words: 342.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.99415204678 5.12529762239 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.40432256504 2.80592935109 121% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581871345029 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 638.1 506.74238477 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.8844001297 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.125 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.375 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.9375 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113975774767 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0390763365882 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0438867956075 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0629419200213 0.151304729494 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0370669523466 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 50.2224549098 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.46 12.4159519038 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.82 8.58950901804 126% => OK
difficult_words: 133.0 78.4519038076 170% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, hence, if, second, secondly, so, then, thus, while, in conclusion, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2050.0 1615.20841683 127% => OK
No of words: 342.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.99415204678 5.12529762239 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.40432256504 2.80592935109 121% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581871345029 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 638.1 506.74238477 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.8844001297 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.125 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.375 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.9375 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113975774767 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0390763365882 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0438867956075 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0629419200213 0.151304729494 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0370669523466 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 50.2224549098 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.46 12.4159519038 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.82 8.58950901804 126% => OK
difficult_words: 133.0 78.4519038076 170% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.