Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Governments should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state sponsored Olympic teams

How to allocate the financial resources for government to maximize the benefit has been always the heat topic among modern citizens. It can not be denied that athletics can improve physical health of residents, which leads to some in the society hold the view that sports field should be invested more money than arts. As far as culture, economy and government duty are considered, I strongly hold the view that government ought to spend more money in arts instead of athletics. First and foremost, providing financial support to various artistic categories can be constructive to the local culture and promote the image of the city(or the region) comprehensively. A piece of art work like a sculpture or photograph can be the epitome of a certain period history and the carrier of local culture; furthermore,the famous art work can be the cultural advertisement of a city or even a country. The best example is the Denmark\'s Little Mermaid. Thus, art is important to the culture of a region. If government put more money in arts, it can promote local cultural industry in two ways. The first way is to preserve local culture. These artists who are given the subsidies and supported by local government can settle in this area and learn or create local culture naturally. As a result, the local cultural elements can be seen in the new created painting, music, video...etc. The second way is to create new culture as the inspirations of artists absorbed from local culture can be blended with modern or exotic culture of their own hometowns. However, All the benefits above can be brought by investing athletics. Second,the fact that the prosperous art field contribute to the local economy sustainably also indicates that government should fund arts compared with sports. Take the example of Japan, a country with developed art industry: in the late 20th century, the central government promulgated a series of policies to promote the art industry and improve the oversea influence of Japanese arts. So, various art industry grew up in the past few decades, in the meantime converting to the monetary profit. Furthermore, the new and active art industry, like cartoon and comic art, provided countless jobs and improved the economy. Had the Japanese government not invested the art industry, Japan would not stabilize its position as an economic power. Maybe funding athletics can also spur the economy. However, the flip-side is that only few people,the members of famous team, can enjoy the most part of profit. After all, investing sports is more difficult to form a complete industry structure. Admittedly, there do exist some factors such as public health can contribute to the opposing idea that more capitals are supposed to be spent in athletics, because investing sports can improve the health of citizens by building gyms. Nevertheless, such opinion needs to be examined meticulously. In fact, the government does not need to put extra money in sports as the sports stars are always more popular than artists and the famous teams are never short of investors. Thus, I still stick to my position. In a nutshell, after a clear analysis of the aforementioned statement, I am confident to maintain that government ought to spend more funds in support of arts instead of athletics.can enjoy the most part of profit. After all, investing sports is more difficult to form a complete industry structure. Admittedly, there do exist some factors such as public health can contribute to the opposing idea that more capitals are supposed to be spent in athletics, because investing sports can improve the health of citizens by building gyms. Nevertheless, such opinion needs to be examined meticulously. In fact, the government does not need to put extra money in sports as the sports stars are always more popular than artists and the famous teams are never short of investors. Thus, I still stick to my position. In a nutshell, after a clear analysis of the aforementioned statement, I am confident to maintain that government ought to spend more funds in support of arts instead of athletics.can enjoy the most part of profit. After all, investing sports is more difficult to form a complete industry structure. Admittedly, there do exist some factors such as public health can contribute to the opposing idea that more capitals are supposed to be spent in athletics, because investing sports can improve the health of citizens by building gyms. Nevertheless, such opinion needs to be examined meticulously. In fact, the government does not need to put extra money in sports as the sports stars are always more popular than artists and the famous teams are never short of investors. Thus, I still stick to my position. In a nutshell, after a clear analysis of the aforementioned statement, I am confident to maintain that government ought to spend more funds in support of arts instead of athletics.investing sports is more difficult to form a complete industry structure. Admittedly, there do exist some factors such as public health can contribute to the opposing idea that more capitals are supposed to be spent in athletics, because investing sports can improve the health of citizens by building gyms. Nevertheless, such opinion needs to be examined meticulously. In fact, the government does not need to put extra money in sports as the sports stars are always more popular than artists and the famous teams are never short of investors. Thus, I still stick to my position. In a nutshell, after a clear analysis of the aforementioned statement, I am confident to maintain that government ought to spend more funds in support of arts instead of athletics.investing sports is more difficult to form a complete industry structure. Admittedly, there do exist some factors such as public health can contribute to the opposing idea that more capitals are supposed to be spent in athletics, because investing sports can improve the health of citizens by building gyms. Nevertheless, such opinion needs to be examined meticulously. In fact, the government does not need to put extra money in sports as the sports stars are always more popular than artists and the famous teams are never short of investors. Thus, I still stick to my position. In a nutshell, after a clear analysis of the aforementioned statement, I am confident to maintain that government ought to spend more funds in support of arts instead of athletics.there do exist some factors such as public health can contribute to the opposing idea that more capitals are supposed to be spent in athletics, because investing sports can improve the health of citizens by building gyms. Nevertheless, such opinion needs to be examined meticulously. In fact, the government does not need to put extra money in sports as the sports stars are always more popular than artists and the famous teams are never short of investors. Thus, I still stick to my position. In a nutshell, after a clear analysis of the aforementioned statement, I am confident to maintain that government ought to spend more funds in support of arts instead of athletics.there do exist some factors such as public health can contribute to the opposing idea that more capitals are supposed to be spent in athletics, because investing sports can improve the health of citizens by building gyms. Nevertheless, such opinion needs to be examined meticulously. In fact, the government does not need to put extra money in sports as the sports stars are always more popular than artists and the famous teams are never short of investors. Thus, I still stick to my position. In a nutshell, after a clear analysis of the aforementioned statement, I am confident to maintain that government ought to spend more funds in support of arts instead of athletics.because investing sports can improve the health of citizens by building gyms. Nevertheless, such opinion needs to be examined meticulously. In fact, the government does not need to put extra money in sports as the sports stars are always more popular than artists and the famous teams are never short of investors. Thus, I still stick to my position. In a nutshell, after a clear analysis of the aforementioned statement, I am confident to maintain that government ought to spend more funds in support of arts instead of athletics.because investing sports can improve the health of citizens by building gyms. Nevertheless, such opinion needs to be examined meticulously. In fact, the government does not need to put extra money in sports as the sports stars are always more popular than artists and the famous teams are never short of investors. Thus, I still stick to my position. In a nutshell, after a clear analysis of the aforementioned statement, I am confident to maintain that government ought to spend more funds in support of arts instead of athletics.In a nutshell, after a clear analysis of the aforementioned statement, I am confident to maintain that government ought to spend more funds in support of arts instead of athletics.In a nutshell, after a clear analysis of the aforementioned statement, I am confident to maintain that government ought to spend more funds in support of arts instead of athletics.