Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to poor countries rather than financial aid. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In contemporary society, there is an undeniable fact that economic support from developed nations to poorer countries does not alleviate their poverty rate. Hence, it is widely believed that alternative assistance is needed to invest in underdeveloped ones. From my perspective, I completely concur with this statement.
It is transparent that monetary donations are not beneficial to undeveloped governments in the long run. That is mainly because those authorities would be dependent on financial aid, meaning that they could not modernise and industrialise their countries by themselves if those supports are suspended. For instance, the overwhelming amount of American budgetary aid to Afghanistan has triggered the collapse of the Afghan economy after the Taliban claimed the government. As a consequence, not only underdeveloped countries are not advanced, but also national breakdowns could occur and harm the countries.
Since the financial approach is somewhat dangerous, it is necessary to search for other measures. In my opinion, one of the solutions is the investment in facilities and technology in undeveloped nations. The key rationale is that they could base on those infrastructures to advance the economy in their unique and sustainable way with several instructions from modern countries. Take Quang Linh as an example, he assisted the local people with agricultural techniques in irrigation and cultivating in order to have a reasonable amount of staple crops like rice, corn or sweet potatoes. Therefore, poorer countries could have a significant advancement to not be dependent on support and handle their economic issues.
In conclusion, I hold a firm belief that budgetary provision to undeveloped nations are harmful, and I think that such different effective approaches like infrastructure construction could rescue those countries from poverty and underdevelopment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-25 | viet@2002 | 95 | view |
| 2023-07-19 | quan12341234 | 56 | view |
| 2023-05-07 | ngandaqueen | 73 | view |
| 2023-05-07 | ngandaqueen | 73 | view |
| 2023-04-12 | cinderel | 61 | view |
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to poor countries rather than financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Some countries achieve international success by building specialized facilities to train top athletes instead of providing sports facilities that everyone can use Is it a positive or negative development 84
- Some countries achieve international success by building specialized facilities to train top athletes instead of providing sports facilities that everyone can use Is it a positive or negative development 89
- As machines have become more sophisticated more and more jobs and tasks involving physical hard work can be done automatically Do the positive effects of this trend outweigh the negative effects 89
- Some people believe that children that commit crimes should be punished Others think the parents should be punished instead Discuss both views and give your own opinion 61
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, therefore, for instance, i think, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1622.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.73144876325 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.3285243772 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604240282686 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 518.4 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.399351926 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.769230769 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7692307692 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.76923076923 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154695568807 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0516406652815 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0593290720599 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0988115445571 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0234224407497 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.95 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.09 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, therefore, for instance, i think, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1622.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.73144876325 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.3285243772 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604240282686 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 518.4 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.399351926 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.769230769 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7692307692 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.76923076923 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154695568807 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0516406652815 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0593290720599 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0988115445571 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0234224407497 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.95 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.09 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.