Some people think that the increasing use of computers and mobile phones for communication has a negative effect on young people's reading and writing skills. Do you agree or disagree?
There has been a notion that several societies in modern era are more frequently using advanced devices negatively impact youngsters on their reading and writing skills. I, personally, state the same perspective of this issue for the reasonable points, which will be deliberated in this following essay.
On the one side, the critical thinking of young adults could be improved by writing skills, which they can gain multiple worldwide references with computers. Following that, especially students presenting class assignments, they would simultaneously create an evidence-based argument that responds to given topics of school subjects. Furthermore, many apps on electronic devices could assist students to increase their in-depth reading in order to shape them to be literate societies. In terms of reading comprehension, this overcomes young generation's difficulties because of attractive and appealing features of text or passage to make them enjoy reading.
On the flip side, it is true that many multimedia devices are used by student to do plagiarism, since the accomplishment of excellent scores set them to find instant ways of completing tasks. Consequently, the more frequent they copy from internet sources, the worse their writing ability will beI. In addition, mostly the student often choose reading on mobile phone, this influences the poor physical growth including tired and minuse eyes. To explicate, school learners read pages of online books with high screen intensity for hours where this continuously prompts the use of glasses in early age.
In conclusion, in my standpoint, the use of communication devices degrades the youngsters' academic skills, this includes bad learning habits and poor vision at early stage. This is as long as the tendency of youth literacy seem to be their priority.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-16 | Mollymaul | 75 | view |
| 2024-05-18 | lalo | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-14 | wholemilk | 84 | view |
| 2023-06-23 | hieu13092006 | 89 | view |
| 2023-05-18 | jessie7777 | 84 | view |
- Many old buildings protected by law are part of a nation s history Some people think they should be knocked down and replaced by news ones How important is it to maintain old buildings Should history stand in the way of progress 80
- Tourism has been a good source of revenue in many countries and government should promote the industry Do you agree or disagree 61
- The use of social media is replacing face to face contact with many people Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 89
- The percentage of overweight children in western society has increased by almost 20 in the last ten years Discuss the causes and effects of this disturbing trend 89
- Shops should not be allowed to sell any food or drinks that have been scientifically proven to be bad for people s health To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 290, Rule ID: DT_RESPONDS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'response'?
Suggestion: response
... create an evidence-based argument that responds to given topics of school subjects. Fur...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 345, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to read'.
Suggestion: to read
...dition, mostly the student often choose reading on mobile phone, this influences the po...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ompts the use of glasses in early age. In conclusion, in my standpoint, the use...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, furthermore, if, so, in addition, in conclusion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1546.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52142857143 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93493211687 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.664285714286 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.9538186479 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.833333333 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.08333333333 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148944290489 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0500438035193 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0316878597122 0.0667982634062 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0850617039871 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0291157138129 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.68 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.