Some people believe that children should be banned from using their phones during the school day. Others believe that children should be allowed to use their phones.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
The development of technology brings a lot of benefits to human society, especially the invention of smartphones. This helps our life go easier and easier, it is also a turning-point in technology's history. Therefore, many parents now give their children a phone to study, to contact in a simple way. This situation leads to two opposing opinions: some believe that the usage of mobile phones should be banned during school hours, while others believe that students should be allowed to use them. I would be discussing my views, considering both sides, and sharing examples on why I think the latter side should be preferred.
On one hand, moblie phones have a huge impact on the concentration of the students. These devices have many useful and convenient application such as Messenger, Facebook, TikTok, Twitter but those apps also distract the pupil's study. For instance, when learning a boring period, students usually surf the Internet or play games on the phone instead of trying to concentrate. This can result in a bad score, and eventually, the average score of the class dropped dramatically if there is one student uses cell phone in the class and have been caught. To avoid distraction among the students, these students should be punished to set a example for the others
In the other hand, smartphones even support children a lot in their study. Kids can find many informations, and tips to improve their score in a second on the Internet. There also many apps are designed like a quiz game for student to gain knowledge without boredom. Sometimes, students find embarrassed to ask teacher a question so Internet is the place that they choose to solve their own problem. Furthermore, it also allows children to be in touch with their parents, siblings in case of any emergencies.
To conclude, we cannot deny the advantages of smartphones in human's life. Schools can set some rules to avoid some regretful situations and also allow pupils use it in need to improve the quality of the period.
- Around the world many adults are working from home and more children are beginning to study from home because technology has become cheaper and more accessible Do you think this is a positive or negative development 84
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree 81
- Computers are often argued to be the most important invention of the last hundred years To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 67
- The bar chart below describes some changes about the percentage of people were born in Australia and who were born outside Australia living in urban rural and town between 1995 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature
- Studies suggest that many teenagers these days prefer socialising online to meeting one another in person Why do you think this is the case What measures could be taken to encourage teenagers to spend more time meeting one another in person Give reasons f 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 285, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a simple way" with adverb for "simple"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...r children a phone to study, to contact in a simple way. This situation leads to two opposing o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 633, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...hese students should be punished to set a example for the others In the other ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, second, so, therefore, while, for instance, i think, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1677.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 338.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96153846154 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75377679735 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591715976331 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 524.7 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.8623671137 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.8125 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.125 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.344063698299 0.244688304435 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.093166279303 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0947754807681 0.0667982634062 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185443337768 0.151304729494 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101818096721 0.056905535591 179% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.