Some countries allow old people to work to any age that they want. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
In response to the aging population comes the opinion that senior citizens should be empowered by the authorities to work regardless of their age. Although this practice offers a gateway to improve elderly physical and mental well-being, it cannot justify the imbalance workforce and the likelihood of workplace accidents. Accordingly, I lean toward the idea that the disadvantages eclipsed the advantages.
Rationally, the absence of retirement age ensues elderly mental wellness improvement. In simple words, being employed averts the deterioration of self-esteem in older adults by allowing them to further contribute to the accumulation of social wealth. For instance, many workers in Japan are willing to engage in the labor force beyond their retirement age, which sustains their contribution to society and eases the financial burden on pension schemes. It implies that registering in the workforce enriches their mental health by keeping them busy and reducing the social burden stigma.
Meanwhile, imbalance in the labor market may arise when the elderly targets same positions as younger generation. Since the aged often lack stamina and physical fitness for jobs that require physical demanding, they will search for a favorable work environment such as office worker or manager in a business setting. While other fields witness a potential shortage of workers, some jobs can be unreasonably appealing and competitive to approach due to competence between two labor forces, youths and the elderly, In addition, there are more substantial risks to both older people and society when working at the limit of their age. A prime example is teaching or coaching, where the degradation of memories associated with slower somatic reflexes resulted in frequent mistakes in older people compared to the young generation. That is why working at the edge of retirement generated detrimental repercussions for the elderly and society.
In recapitulation, although it is tempting to permit old labor to work regardless of their age, governments ought to set limits and be careful with the probability of labor accidents. If authorities fail to impose a sufficient solution, stiff competition will result in unnecessary redundancy and shortage in other disciplines.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-10-24 | linh allie | 89 | view |
2024-10-24 | linh allie | 84 | view |
2024-10-01 | tata | 11 | view |
2024-10-01 | tata | 11 | view |
2024-09-28 | tata | 56 | view |
- Some countries allow old people to work to any age that they want Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 89
- Some countries allow old people to work at any age they want Do the advantages outweigh disadvantages 61
- Some countries allow old people to work to any age that they want Do the advantages outweigh disadvantages 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, if, may, so, well, while, for instance, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.3376753507 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1925.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 347.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54755043228 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00848542642 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602305475504 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 612.9 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.6698909877 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.5 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7857142857 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57142857143 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146314723931 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0444539874311 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0376001513284 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.082470773859 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0260786201571 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.21 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.42 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 78.4519038076 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.