Studies suggest that many teenagers these days prefer socialising online to meeting one another in person.
Why do you think this is the case?
What measures could be taken to encourage teenagers to spend more time meeting one another in person?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Researchers suggests that several teenagers opt to talk to an other person on an online platforms when compared to meeting them in person. This is happening manily due to increased screentime for teenagers. There are muliple ways that this can be solved.
One of the main reason as to why this is happeing is that due to the recent covid-19 outbreak. Since most of the students were forced to say indoors and turn to online modes of communication to not only study but to also reach out to their friends. This has lead to children realizing that they can be connected to their friends right from the comfort of their home, even if their friend is on the other side of the world. In other words, while in the early days chidren used to only meet their friends if they ventured out of the house like to the school or playground. However now, due to the recent technological advancements, chidren are able to toggle their way from one friend to the other and chat with muliple friends at the same time. Another major reason for the adoloscents to prefer online communication over in-person meets is due to lack of leisure time. Teenagers are often riddled with a huge mount of homework and schoolwork that they need to finish regularly. On top of that, most of them even have extra-curricular activities and interests that they persue on a day-to-day basis. While this is fruitful for them in their professional career, it also takes away from their free time that they could spend meeting and ineteracting with their friends.
There are two effective solutions to encourage children to meander outside and meet their friends. First, workload for teenagers should be reduced so that they can not only excel in their studies but also get a chance to explore the outdoors. Second, more teenage friendly places should be built to encourage a safe and secure enviornment for them. Most of the common areas either cater to adults or children below 10 years of age. Establishing teenage friendly places would encourage them to venture outside of their homes.
In conclusion, reducing the educational strain on teenagers and building adoloscent friendly places would allow them to socialise in person. If these solutions can be implemented, majourity of teenagers would switch to in person meets than socialising online.
- The chart shows the results of surveys in one African country asking teenagers the main reasons for using their phones between 2016 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The chart shows the percentage of women and men in one Asian country who passed when they took their driving test between 1980 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The chart shows the percentage of women and men in one Asian country who passed when they took their driving test between 1980 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be sure to address the mos 75
- In recent years many small local shops have closed because customers travel to large shopping centres or malls to do their shopping Is this a positive or a negative development 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 60, Rule ID: AN_OTHER[1]
Message: Did you mean 'another'? This word sequence is usually spelled together.
Suggestion: another
...s that several teenagers opt to talk to an other person on an online platforms when comp...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 89, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'platform'?
Suggestion: platform
...to talk to an other person on an online platforms when compared to meeting them in person...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, while, as to, in conclusion, in other words, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 24.0651302605 166% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 71.0 41.998997996 169% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1928.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 392.0 315.596192385 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91836734694 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65300235413 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515306122449 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 585.0 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.6400565532 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.473684211 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6315789474 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.36842105263 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277963275503 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0890767149652 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0662317945434 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181180374389 0.151304729494 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0316109159124 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.