Some children spend hours every day on their smartphones.
Why is this the case? Do you think this is a positive or a negative development?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Write at least 250 words.
People argued that in modern days digital phones become an indispensable thing for kids and some children spend too much their leisure time using smartphones. In this essay, I will discuss why this problem happens and I believe that this is a negative development.
There are several reasons why some kids spent hours on their smartphones. Firstly, smartphones provide a platform for entertainment such as YouTube or Tiktok and they can help children relax and reduce stress after long studying hours. In addition with access to games and the internet, children can keep themselves occupied and entertained for hours. For example, my brother often spends his spare time entertaining himself by using his smartphone to play games or watch videos after learning. Secondly, smartphones also provide a means of socialization. With the rise of social media, children can stay connected with friends and family, which can lead to a sense of belonging. Finally, smartphones are the best gadget to help kids study through educational apps. And children can be attracted by these apps so they often spend hours using smartphones to study.
However, I believe that this is a negative trend and it will affect children a lot. To begin with, using digital phones a lot will make kids become addicted and they will forget their studies. For instance, during corona pandemic season most students could cover up their studies through smartphones they became addicted to it and they used to count on bad habits like gaming or listening to music. In addition, children will not know the value of time because they only spend their leisure time using smartphones and children will only waste their time on invaluable things like chatting with friends or watching movies.
In conclusion, children tend to use smartphones a lot because of entertainment and education. However, it seems to me that children do not use digital phones a lot every day and they only use smartphones in need to avoid becoming addicted and wasting their time.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-21 | tsln7607 | 78 | view |
| 2023-09-01 | hinhin411 | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-12 | nle2006 | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-02 | tran quynh | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-02 | tran quynh | 70 | view |
- Some children spend hours every day on their smartphones Why is this the case Do you think this is a positive or a negative development Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience Write at least 250 73
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists and not local people Why is this the case What can be done to attract local people 73
- The table below shows the number of temporary migrant workers in four countries in 2003 and 2006 and the number of these workers per 1 000 people in these countries in 2006 73
- The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The charts below show the comparison of time spent in minutes per day by UK s Males and Females on household and leisure activities in 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 240, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
...ce stress after long studying hours. In addition with access to games and the internet, ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, firstly, however, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1688.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0843373494 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67098542839 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536144578313 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 509.4 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.5698296574 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.5 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.75 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.6875 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192680262629 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.076748639986 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0490400632424 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138959470192 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0455626233966 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.