The graph below shows the percentage of Australians that exported to 4 countries from
1990 to 2012.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make
comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
The line graph depicts the proportion of Australian goods imported into four countries: Japan, the US, China, and India, between 1990 and 2012.
In general, looking at the graph, we can see that while China and India’s figures experienced an upward trend, the figures of the two remaining countries saw a downward trend. In addition, China’s figure was the most transformed.
Japan imported the largest percentage of Australian goods for most of the period given. Starting at the highest point at about 27% in 1990, Japan’s figure declined significantly to 20% in 1995, then had a steady drop to about 18% in the rest of the survey. Meanwhile, in the first ten years given, the US’s figure fluctuated between 9% and 11% before plummeting to 5% in 2010, then rising slightly to 7% in 2012.
In contrast, from 1990 to 2000, China’s figure increased gradually by 3% before surging to 25% in 2010, then reaching a peak of 28% in 2012. The percentage of Australian exports to India stayed unchanged at 3% from 1990 to 2000. It rose dramatically to 8% in 2010 before falling slowly to 5% in the last year.
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 73
- Academic Writing Part 2 You should spend about 40 minutes on this task Write at least 250 words Write about the following topic The average standard of people s health is likely to be lower in the future than it is now To what extent do you agree or disag 73
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes for example working for a charity improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports to younger children To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- When students move to a new school they sometimes face problems How can schools help these students with their problems Use specific reasons and examples to explain your answer 56
- The pie chart shows the sources of electricity in the four countries from 2003 to 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, then, while, in addition, in contrast, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 921.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.796875 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66971159979 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609375 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 247.5 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.2926313519 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.333333333 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 5.23603664747 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16148413326 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0726006084417 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0696638887532 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100862494778 0.15604864568 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0387245947791 0.0819641961636 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.