The plans show an office in a university in 2005 and the same office now.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.
The pictures are illustrating the interior organization of a university office in 2005 and the changes happened at present.
To summarize, some massive changes took place in this office over the period. The office plan was old fashioned in 2005, but it has been redesigned to a new style that gives a modern vibe.
In 2005, the whole office area was divided into four compartments. The largest compartment was the hall area attached to the entrance. It had two arm chairs two filing cabinets and a photocpies for providing office amenties. A noticeboard was hanged in the east side of the wall, right to the entrance. On the left hand side after the entrance, there is a long room. It had two desks on either sides facing each other including two filing cabinets. The room at the north eastern corner also had two desks and filing cabinet. Opposit to this room at the north-west corner, there was a desk and a filing cabinet.
Contrary to the year 2005, there is only a single compartnent retained at the nort west corner and remained unchanged. Other compartments are completely removed making a big space where desks are borught together attaching each other and placed at the north east side. A sofa and an oval shaped table are added taking the arm chairs around providing a modern fashion. The notice board has been placed on the other side from the previous place. Furthermore, a water cooler and a coffee machine are the latest addition which are placed just left to the entrance.
To sum up, the office design replanned to accommodate new ameneties and for providing modern working environment.
- Take a look at the graphics and complete the task The table and chart show data about reading among people under 30 years old Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should spend about 67
- The charts below give information about levels of education in Glasgow a city in Scottland in 2010 11
- The graph below shows US consumers average annual expenditures on cell phone and residential phone services between 2001 and 2010 Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below Summarise the information by selecting and re 73
- The charts show world pineapple exports by the top three pineapple producing countries in 2009 and 2019 and a breakdown of the cost to the consumer of each pineapple in 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make c 78
- In many countries international tourism has become an important source of income However it also has negative effects Do the benefits of international tourism outweigh the disadvantages Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from y 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, so, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1339.0 965.302439024 139% => OK
No of words: 276.0 196.424390244 141% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85144927536 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59962947532 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 106.607317073 140% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539855072464 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 422.1 283.868780488 149% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.33902439024 230% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 8.94146341463 190% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.7548028289 43.030603864 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 78.7647058824 112.824112599 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2352941176 22.9334400587 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.17647058824 5.23603664747 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 15.0 4.09268292683 367% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116768341775 0.215688989381 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0400966189014 0.103423049105 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0442889061336 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.084647466036 0.15604864568 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0458163004147 0.0819641961636 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.2329268293 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 61.2550243902 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.55 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 40.7170731707 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.