Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure
that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that
government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own
position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and
supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
Arts show us creativity of human beings. It is a medium of non-verbal language that shows us cultures, stories, artistic skills and so on. Arts preserve culture and brings empathy among people. So, government funding of arts is a must to ensure its positive diffusion in a society. Though it hinders the innovation and independence of artist mind still it is needed for present world.
Artist mind is full of creativity. Unfortunately, arts are not financially facilitated in society. As a result, artists get demotivated about their arts. So, to ensure nurturing the creativity of artists funding from government would help a lot. For example, Mughal Emperor Shah Jahan built ‘Taj Mahal’, which is one of the 7 wonders of the world and a beautiful representation of artist mind. This not only preserved the Mughal culture but also it makes us to think how innovative a human mind can be. Pyramids from Egypt, Greek sculptures also teaches us the same things. These examples also show us why funding is important for flourishing arts and making it available for human.
Although funding comes with some drawbacks, funding kills the emancipation of artistic human mind and make the artists economically dependent on government. Artists may also face lack of innovation due to funding. But in a modern society like today, where arts are not appreciated these things become very silly. So, to keep the artistic minds alive and flourishing in the society, funding from government can be a powerful medium.
Some may argue about the influence of funding on the freedom of arts and economically dependence of artists. But an artistic mind cannot be nurtured without paying the due respect or ensuring healthy life and social wellbeing. So, I strongly agree with government funding to the arts to ensure flourishing and making it available to all.
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts Write a response in which you d 83
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts Write a response in which you d 62
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts Write a response in which you d 66
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts Write a response in which you d 50
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts Write a response in which you d 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 231, Rule ID: MUST_HAVE_TO[1]
Message: After 'must', the verb is used without 'to'. Probably, you should use 'must' or 'have to' here.
Suggestion: must; have to
...le. So, government funding of arts is a must to ensure its positive diffusion in a soci...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, still, well, for example, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.3162921348 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 58.6224719101 67% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1548.0 2235.4752809 69% => OK
No of words: 304.0 442.535393258 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09210526316 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82897031814 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 215.323595506 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.552631578947 0.4932671777 112% => OK
syllable_count: 484.2 704.065955056 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.9528450972 60.3974514979 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 77.4 118.986275619 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.2 23.4991977007 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.05 5.21951772744 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280868130421 0.243740707755 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0992189364365 0.0831039109588 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0987491002545 0.0758088955206 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212815952202 0.150359130593 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0612848963325 0.0667264976115 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 14.1392134831 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 48.8420337079 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.65 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 100.480337079 72% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 11.8971910112 46% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.