In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions.
According to the statement mentioned, novices have more contributions compared to specialists in any field. Although this statement can hold true in some circumstances, I believe that in some specialized fields beginners are not able to have a contribution as much as experts. So, I agree with this point of view to some extent.
What we have to consider in some fields especially those related to science is that people are required to have special skills and knowledge which are gained as a result of years of training and studying. Clearly, it is hard for a beginner to seek breakthroughs, as they do not have adequate knowledge to even cope with basic problems. For example, in physics, almost all the new innovations have been found by those titans, such as Newton, Albert Einstein, Stephan Hawking and the list can go on and on. All these people spent their whole lives to study the existing knowledge, then they had the ability to explore the new things like the theory of relativity. It is clear that a newcomer with little knowledge cannot make a useful contribution in this subject, and it is impossible they gain such a success like physic experts overnight. So, this proves that beginners are not likely to come up with new ideas and make contributions in some fields and even if they have any role, they help and work with professional people as an intern. Unless, the beginner has extraterrestrial intelligence or high God-given talent, which makes the situation completely different. The best example is Elliott Tanner who is a prodigy He is a brilliant 13-years-old kid graduated in physics. Such a beginner can be exceptional and have many advances in physics even more than experienced experts with a lot of knowledge in the same field.
Further, in music industry in which people have to take years of practice to master their skill to eventually obtain the ability to compose or play professionally. If a beginner wants to play for us, she or he will play terribly undoubtedly. This indicates the fact that novices with the lack of enough knowledge and skills are not likely to contribute to the field.
However, some might say that as the experts might be immersed too much in their science and this might cause them to become biased and restricted in their particular realms. In this condition, on the contrary, the beginners are more likely to see the whole picture. Even with limited knowledge, they are able to combine different aspects to come up with new things which might be an important contribution. Also, novices are more risk-takers than experts and they are more prone to doing and experiencing new things. For instance, in physiotherapy, the skillful therapist is more conservative to perform new methods for patients, by contrast, the newcomer therapist just by relying on the results shown from new methods tries to help patients and lefts the prejudices and overcomes his fear and does not limit himself to only old ways that had positive outputs. In this way, the cooperation of skillful expert and novice can be on the right way or path for treatment of patients.
In conclusion, in my view, we cannot ignore the role of beginners in some fields, as they can explore special outcomes that experts have never thought about. However, in some majors which are needed special skill such people cannot have influential contribution.
- Government must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive because it is primarily in cities that a nation s cultural traditions are preserved and generated 50
- Some people believe that government officials must carry out the will of the people they serve Others believe that officials should base their decisions on their own judgement Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your 62
- We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whose views contradict our own Disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning 70
- Some people believe today that everyone has a right to access to the Internet and that governments should provide this access for free Other people believe that access to the internet is not a right and should be paid for like other services Discuss both 61
- Governments should place few if any restrictions on scientific research and development Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In develop 66
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, then, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my view, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 33.0505617978 139% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 81.0 58.6224719101 138% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2807.0 2235.4752809 126% => OK
No of words: 569.0 442.535393258 129% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93321616872 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.88402711743 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81335202346 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 272.0 215.323595506 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.478031634446 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 870.3 704.065955056 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.38483146067 251% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.4848709189 60.3974514979 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.043478261 118.986275619 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7391304348 23.4991977007 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4347826087 5.21951772744 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262305178613 0.243740707755 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0812259123009 0.0831039109588 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0767116661744 0.0758088955206 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138671945916 0.150359130593 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0604714803986 0.0667264976115 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 134.0 100.480337079 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, then, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my view, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 33.0505617978 139% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 81.0 58.6224719101 138% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2807.0 2235.4752809 126% => OK
No of words: 569.0 442.535393258 129% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93321616872 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.88402711743 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81335202346 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 272.0 215.323595506 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.478031634446 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 870.3 704.065955056 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.38483146067 251% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.4848709189 60.3974514979 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.043478261 118.986275619 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7391304348 23.4991977007 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4347826087 5.21951772744 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262305178613 0.243740707755 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0812259123009 0.0831039109588 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0767116661744 0.0758088955206 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138671945916 0.150359130593 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0604714803986 0.0667264976115 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 134.0 100.480337079 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.