Do you agree or disagree? Asking children to work in small groups is the best way to teach young children.
On the topic of proper and productive adolescent cognitive and emotional development, group activities and organizations are some of the most fundamental and thus, essential points of contention, be these groups small or large. In the following essay, I will present my viewpoint on whether having children assemble in groups, works towards “teaching”, a word which I will assume mainly encompasses social behavior development, them in a satisfactory way or not.
In congruency with countless research studies conducted on the issue and the evidence-based, dangerous implications and effects of loneliness on a still-developing human brain, I wholeheartedly agree with the notion of asking children to work with their friends towards a common assignment is essential to acquiring the skills necessary for them to flourish in the later stages of their lives. Humans are, after all, social creatures and will inevitably have to function in a society with many moving parts and set-in-stone responsibilities not only for the individual, but also for groups. To this end, what better time to teach a person the importance of teamwork, cooperation, giving and receiving constructive criticism and a plethora of other infinitely prominent life skills via team assignments, than when their cognition is most responsive to new information?
Another aspect that group assignments emphasize by nature, is the focus on the individual, particularly communication and appropriate etiquette when dealing with others while working on a common objective. Upon being put in a socially engaging situation, any person must know how to conduct themselves in order to reach his or her desired outcome. As said before, us humans usually find ourselves in more social situations. Learning how to communicate our needs as well as expectations accurately and respectfully is best done using group assignments from a young age.
Ultimately, it is the collective of lone entities that make up a group and these groups form our societies and unless correct behavior in the form of collective group assignments is not given, aforementioned crucial life skills cannot be taught and will not take root in a child’s mind. Therefore, the absence of team projects can be construed as an injustice to children enrolled in any education program, as they will undoubtedly be improperly equipped to deal with the hurdles that life will put in their way to success.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-30 | AJ720 | 88 | view |
| 2022-12-30 | Alfaromeo | 73 | view |
| 2020-03-17 | syuku | 62 | view |
| 2020-03-17 | zhaodejian | 76 | view |
| 2019-02-20 | Orange Dots | 73 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree Asking children to work in small groups is the best way to teach young children 88
- TOPIC People in society work in many different settings and for a variety of reasons What do you think is the main reason why people have jobs to feel happier about their lives to save money for the future to develop new skills Use specific examples and d 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People can solve important problems by themselves or with the help from their family members so there s no need for the government to help them 78
- Consider a situation where you are required to learn a challenging new skill You could learn this skills from someone above you like a boss or supervisor Or you could be taught the skills by someone at your own level like a classmate or colleague Which wo 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement One of the characteristics of successful leaders is the sense of responsibility for accepting their mistakes 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 434, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a satisfactory way" with adverb for "satisfactory"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...asses social behavior development, them in a satisfactory way or not. In congruency with countless...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, still, therefore, thus, well, while, after all, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2062.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 382.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39790575916 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42095241839 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24002561107 2.67179642975 121% => OK
Unique words: 233.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609947643979 0.524837075471 116% => OK
syllable_count: 637.2 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.6003584229 53% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 20.1344086022 169% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 80.9943371146 48.9658058833 165% => OK
Chars per sentence: 187.454545455 100.406767564 187% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.7272727273 20.6045352989 169% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.45110844103 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185756443735 0.236089414692 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0587693320968 0.076458572812 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0452887821981 0.0737576698707 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104986266199 0.150856017488 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.036657866409 0.0645574589148 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.4 11.7677419355 182% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.51 58.1214874552 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.10430107527 213% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.7 10.1575268817 174% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 10.9000537634 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.12 8.01818996416 126% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 86.8835125448 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 21.5 10.002688172 215% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.0537634409 155% => OK
text_standard: 22.0 10.247311828 215% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.