A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
While it may seem reasonable to allow students to study different subjects even before entering college, I believe that adopting a uniform curriculum would be much more beneficial. The vast majority of schools are constituted by those among the ages of 5 to 18. it's not very often that a child or a teenager already knows what they're going to be doing in the next five or ten years. As they are young and curious, these children tend to vacillate between a plentitude of courses, branches of study and various kinds of coursework.
Firstly, to illustrate the rareness of a student seeing themselves in a well-established field this early on, let us consider the example of Albert einstein. we are all aware of how deeply einstein was involved in his area of interest. He was invested in the world of physics and worked hard his whole life to not just stumble upon, but to develop the science behind the idea of general and special relativity. it would be pretentious of us to assume that all children are just as aware of their futures as einstein was.
Secondly, in order to create a fair set of opportunities for every student within the country, they must be given a common platform and consequently, a general entrance test. taking up courses that are not analogous in nature would be causing an undesired bias and paving way for discrimination among students. we can understand this by utilising the famous examples- the usa and india. two completely discrete nations with study laws and practices that are clearly discernible from one another. In the usa, peers can take up different coursework, whereas in india, it is a predetermined syllabus and only branches out as one completes highschool. I feel that the latter has been successful in allowing students to wait out their life-making decisionsfor another two years so that they can decide whether it is what they truly wish to pursue. I too am living proof to substantiate the above statement.
All in all, providing a tad bit more time for schoolchildren to think about who they are and who they want to be is of utmost importance as it would probably also inspire them to cogitate and question their true potentials without the underlying pressure of having to choose from a varied pool of topics. they would not have to give up on one subject to accomodate another.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-09 | KLH | 66 | view |
| 2024-09-28 | ascetichedonist | 83 | view |
| 2024-08-30 | Rishab@1999 | 66 | view |
| 2024-08-27 | Rishab@1999 | 50 | view |
| 2024-07-25 | BRUHATHI2 | 50 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 263, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Its
...ted by those among the ages of 5 to 18. its not very often that a child or a teenag...
^^^
Line 1, column 328, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: they're
... child or a teenager already knows what theyre going to be doing in the next five or t...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 159, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: We
...onsider the example of Albert einstein. we are all aware of how deeply einstein wa...
^^
Line 3, column 412, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...idea of general and special relativity. it would be pretentious of us to assume th...
^^
Line 5, column 176, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Taking
... consequently, a general entrance test. taking up courses that are not analogous in na...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 312, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: We
... way for discrimination among students. we can understand this by utilising the fa...
^^
Line 5, column 388, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Two
...the famous examples- the usa and india. two completely discrete nations with study ...
^^^
Line 5, column 850, Rule ID: AM_I[1]
Message: Did you mean 'am I'?
Suggestion: am I
...s what they truly wish to pursue. I too am living proof to substantiate the above ...
^^
Line 7, column 306, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
...to choose from a varied pool of topics. they would not have to give up on one subjec...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, well, whereas, while, i feel, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 39.0 33.0505617978 118% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 58.6224719101 116% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1937.0 2235.4752809 87% => OK
No of words: 403.0 442.535393258 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8064516129 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48049772903 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81959676491 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 245.0 215.323595506 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60794044665 0.4932671777 123% => OK
syllable_count: 616.5 704.065955056 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.4162491027 60.3974514979 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.941176471 118.986275619 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7058823529 23.4991977007 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.52941176471 5.21951772744 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 7.80617977528 115% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168355087235 0.243740707755 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0419629284189 0.0831039109588 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0399056104609 0.0758088955206 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0890393678359 0.150359130593 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0297542446173 0.0667264976115 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 48.8420337079 116% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 100.480337079 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.