The graph below gives information about the percentage of the population in four Asian countries living in cities from 1970 to 2020 with predictions for 2030 and 2040 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparis

Essay topics:

The graph below gives information about the percentage of the population in four Asian countries living in cities from 1970 to 2020, with predictions for 2030 and 2040.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The graph illustrates the proportion of citizens in four different Asian countries from 1970 to 2020, with predictions for 2030 and 2040. Overall, the city demographics rate of Malaysia and Indonesia experienced the most significant increase, while the population in cities of the Philippines and Thailand rose slightly over the period.
In 1970, 30% of Malaysians lived in cities. This figure climbed to 45% in 1990 before witnessing a substantial rise to 75% and will be up to 80% and 85% in 2030 and 2040, respectively. There were less than 15% of people living in cities in Indonesia in 1970. This figure surprisingly increased to half of all Filipinos in 2020. The number will still have risen to more than 60% by 2040.
The population rate in Philippine cities was more than 30%, which was the highest in 1970. This figure reached a peak of 50% in 1990. From then on, however, it decreased steadily to the level of 40% in 2010 before having risen to nearly 45% by 2020. The number of citizens in the Philippines will gradually increase up to 50% again in 2040. There was nearly 20% of the population lived in cities in Thailand and grew constantly to about 30% from 1970 to 2020 and will continuously increase to 40% and 45% in 2030 and 2040, separately.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-11-07 hahoaan 73 view
2024-10-13 Giang Tran 73 view
2024-10-13 Giang Tran 73 view
2024-10-13 Giang Tran 73 view
2024-10-13 Giang Tran 73 view
Essays by user TriNguyen :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, still, then, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 33.7804878049 160% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1044.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 221.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72398190045 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71803743977 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515837104072 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 294.3 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.3102626728 43.030603864 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.0 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4166666667 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.58333333333 5.23603664747 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257340825699 0.215688989381 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0950488245186 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103284287567 0.0843802449381 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191764227009 0.15604864568 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0755841490291 0.0819641961636 92% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.