Some children spend hours every day on their smartphones.
Why is this the case? Do you think this is a positive or a negative development?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
In modern times, some children spend hours on their smartphones daily. From an overall perspective, this is a result of parents unconsciously letting their children use phones as a tool to keep them occupied. I strongly believe that sitting in front of a screen for hours every day is detrimental to children's health and development.
There are many reasons why minors are becoming obsessed with phones; one of them is the increasingly irresponsible parenting method. As a result of the hectic lifestyle, when parents come home from work, they often find themselves exhausted, and therefore they do not have time to spend with their kids. The lack of essential connections between family members leaves the minor with no other choice but to use phones as the only means of entertainment. As an illustration, thousands of videos featuring folk tales have garnered millions of views on YouTube for children. In the past, these could be told by the parents as bedtime stories, which greatly enhanced the bond between generations.
The prevalence of excessive smartphone use has several repercussions on children. A common one is their badly affected well-being. Less time spent outdoors due to more phone use can result in several health problems. For example, children who are on the phone for a long time from day to day often suffer from either obesity or malnutrition. In addition, unfiltered content on the Internet may be inappropriate for youngsters. For instance, children can easily access Logan Paul, a YouTube channel featuring violent videos. This can be the cause of children's violence-oriented characteristics as they grow up.
In conclusion, I reiterate that the overuse of these modern portable electronics is a bad development, especially among youngsters, and adults must consider this development more thoroughly as their lifestyle promotes it. Most importantly, these habits are weakening these kids physically as well as spiritually.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-21 | tsln7607 | 78 | view |
| 2023-09-01 | hinhin411 | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-12 | nle2006 | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-02 | tran quynh | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-02 | tran quynh | 70 | view |
- Some children spend hours every day on their smartphones Why is this the case Do you think this is a positive or a negative development Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 84
- The most important aim of science should be to improve people s lives To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
In modern times, some children spend hou...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to childrens health and development. There are many reasons why minors are be...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hanced the bond between generations. The prevalence of excessive smartphone u...
^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ted characteristics as they grow up. In conclusion, I reiterate that the over...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1656.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35922330097 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11681569323 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614886731392 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.3658871362 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.4117647059 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1764705882 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.64705882353 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214537200026 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0659455346707 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0581422406466 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130830397957 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0754399425807 0.056905535591 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.51 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.