It is primarily through our identification with social groups that we define ourselves.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Often, people use the name of the social group to which they belong to introduce themselves; for example, many professors introduce themselves as a “professor” before adding specific details about themselves. In this regard, it is often argued that the identity of people is primarily determined though the identification with social groups. Although there are indeed some cases where social groups play a crucial role in formulating peoples' identity, there are other more important factors that are consequential to define individuals.
To begin with, espeically in the academia, social groups play a pivotal role in defining an individual's identity. This is because researchers who belong to and constitute the academia should follow the set of information that the academica canonizes. To illustrate, it is worth noting that the identity of a researcher is mostly determined by his set of publications, whose acceptance in a journal and the concomitant visibility is primarily determined by the academia. A researcher defying one's social group and instead prating one's groundless belief will be ostracized by one's colleagues, and thereby would not be able to do any meaningful acadmic activities. Therefore, in order to become a "real" researcher, an individual must follow the set of the rules and canonical axioms of the academia. Therefore, people are sometimes defined by social groups.
Regardless of the previous case, however, social groups do not always define people's identity. This is because social groups also require their axioms to be subverted in order for them to evolve. In this regard, people's commitment to their belief and eagerness to change the social groups they belong to are also important. This is, for example, well manifested in the case of dealing with a so-called paradigm shift. Albert Einstein did not allow his social group-the physics academia to define him. Rather, he tried to persuade the entire academia to follow his belief on the theory of relativity. Although he faced some impediments at first, he put extra miles to elaborate his theory and persuade his colleagues with it. He managed to change the perspective of the physics acadmia, and this helped the entire academia to unravel the previously inexplicable phenomena. As this example reveals, social groups do not always define people's identity.
In brief, I adamantly believe that there are other factors, such as peoples' commitment to their beliefs, that are more important to define the individual's identity. Therefore, rather than myopically seeking to be in part of a predefined social group, people should hold on to their beliefs.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-27 | mei_unavailable | 58 | view |
| 2023-08-29 | tomlee0205 | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-01 | Jonginn | 66 | view |
| 2023-03-09 | 宋致遠 | 70 | view |
| 2023-01-07 | pavithra ramesh | 62 | view |
- In any field of endeavor it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement 83
- The following appeared in a memo from a vice president of a large highly diversified company Ten years ago our company had two new office buildings constructed as regional headquarters for two regions The buildings were erected by different construction c 63
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company According to a recent report from our marketing department during the past year fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any ot 58
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts Write a response in which you d 66
- Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporting your position you should consider ways in which the statement might or mig 16
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 93, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...oups play a pivotal role in defining an individuals identity. This is because researchers w...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 692, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...tivities. Therefore, in order to become a 'real' researcher, an individ...
^
Line 4, column 144, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
..., that are more important to define the individuals identity. Therefore, rather than myopic...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, so, therefore, well, for example, in brief, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 58.6224719101 101% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2239.0 2235.4752809 100% => OK
No of words: 417.0 442.535393258 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36930455635 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5189133491 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96376295829 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 215.323595506 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.489208633094 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 729.9 704.065955056 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.3355387923 60.3974514979 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.95 118.986275619 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.85 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 5.21951772744 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.83258426966 228% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147077740139 0.243740707755 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.05353118372 0.0831039109588 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0399127349393 0.0758088955206 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0928321212819 0.150359130593 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0342944886593 0.0667264976115 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 14.1392134831 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 48.8420337079 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 12.1743820225 111% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.1639044944 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 100.480337079 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.8971910112 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.