The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source Australia and France in 1980 and 2000.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, make comparisons where relevant.
The two pie charts below analyze figures of production of electricity, in Australia and France, in 1980 and 2000.
The pie chart on the left represents the year of 1980, while the one on the right is about 2000, both of them give numbers of units used in producing the electricity by fuel sources. The units are depicted in different scales, and with different colors.
After analyzing, it’s found that in 1980, the total production was 90 units. The highest portions went equally to both the coal and the natural gas, which means that it was highly depended on them for producing electricity. Meanwhile, the oil got the lowest category (only 5 %), but at the same time, using the nuclear power wasn’t that low, it was 20%, so it was ranked the third in the scales.
On the contrary, in 2000, the total production almost had been multiplied. The huge depend was on the nuclear power, it was nearly 70%. While the usage of natural gas and the hydro power was the same. However, the natural gas and the hydro power got tiny divisions, which means that they were the lowest in usage, or could even be neglected.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-16 | tata | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-16 | tata | 67 | view |
| 2020-07-27 | Charlotte Cullen | 61 | view |
| 2020-03-25 | tronghuy230903 | 61 | view |
| 2017-06-06 | mr.cuong95 | 69 | view |
- As most people spend a major part of their adult life at work job satisfaction is an important element of individual wellbeing What factor contributes to job satisfaction How realistic is the expectation of job satisfaction for all workers 61
- The graphs below show unemployment rates and average earnings according to level of education Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The Proportions of Pupils Attending Four Secondary School Types Between Between 2000 and 2009 78
- Some people think that keeping pets is good for children while others think it is dangerous and unhealthy Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- The percentage of overweight children in western society has increased by almost 20 in the last ten years Discuss the causes and effects of this disturbing trend 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 9, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'charts'.
Suggestion: charts
... and France, in 1980 and 2000. The pie chart on the left represents the year of 1980...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 183, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ducing the electricity by fuel sources. The units are depicted in different scales,...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, third, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 917.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.63131313131 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36051498816 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585858585859 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 272.7 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.3233572736 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.7 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.1 5.23603664747 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148661346747 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0659937909528 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0905945631824 0.0843802449381 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126691720035 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10441288658 0.0819641961636 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.