Some people think that everyone has the right to have access to university education, and that government should make it free for all students no matter what financial background they have. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion.
It is argued that education is the fundamental right of everyone; recently, the demand for education is increasingly higher than in the past. Therefore, governments should abolish tuition fees for people with all kinds of financial status. I believe that waiving tuition is a double-edged for both students and society.
There are several reasons why people should be entitled to attend tertiary education, no matter what financial background they have. First, this will benefit individuals, especially those in difficult circumstances or those who do not have the affordability of higher education. As a result, people can find jobs more efficiently and have a better life with a college education. Meanwhile, this policy also brings society numerous advantages. The governments will have a higher quality workforce when they cover higher education tuition for students. Therefore, the economy will flourish and help develop the country.
Despite the aforementioned benefits, I can only partially agree that free-college policy can do both the beneficiaries and society a disservice. The labor market is increasingly competitive, so if there are too many bachelors and degrees, it will be difficult to secure jobs for them. In addition, when many people have college qualifications, companies or organizations will require a higher level, such as people with bachelor's degrees. Furthermore, the provision of free-of-charge education can make the governments need more money to spend on other purposes, such as building infrastructure.
In conclusion, while the potential benefits of a university tuition waiver make it seem like a good idea, the government should not make it accessible to everyone.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-23 | dorae | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-19 | dorae | 67 | view |
| 2022-08-14 | ThaoNguyen_1 | 67 | view |
| 2022-07-22 | HANH DZUNG | 73 | view |
| 2022-03-04 | Toki1508 | 56 | view |
- The chart below shows the numbers of three types of visitors to a museum between 1997 and 2012 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists and not local people Why is this the case What can be done to attract local people 73
- Some people believe that there should be fixed punishments for each type of crime Others however argue that the circumstances of an individual crime and the motivation for committing it should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishment D 56
- The graph below shows the average time spent by four car manufacturers to produce vehicles at their US factories 67
- The graph below shows the three different kinds of emission sources oil coal gas of greenhouse gas in the UK Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, if, so, therefore, while, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 41.998997996 50% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1445.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.57915057915 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22031331597 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.586872586873 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.1283835392 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.214285714 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.14285714286 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.344516068626 0.244688304435 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102768124233 0.084324248473 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0732861687994 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184688801744 0.151304729494 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0553696529872 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.08 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, if, so, therefore, while, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 41.998997996 50% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1445.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.57915057915 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22031331597 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.586872586873 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.1283835392 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.214285714 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.14285714286 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.344516068626 0.244688304435 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102768124233 0.084324248473 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0732861687994 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184688801744 0.151304729494 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0553696529872 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.08 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.