Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spent elsewhere.
To what extent do you agree with this view?
A school of thought holds that the investment of authority in the arts is wasteful. Instead of this people believe that this money should be spent on other areas. After scrutinizing this viewpoint, I partially agree with this.
It is irrefutable that the downsides of allocating money to the arts are varied. Initially, the fees of investment in the area are seemingly grossly inflated for developing countries. In fact, opposing to developed nations, the developing ones do not almost have abundant financial resources consequently the government of the nation cannot have enough money for the vital problems of their country such as healthcare, education and economic. As a result, the allocation to the arts is likely impossible even is wasteful for them. Moreover, this spending can put the government at risk of financial loss. Apparently, it will be a hazardous investment, if the form of art invested by the government does not exert sustainable values, constituting a long-lasting development regardless of time. Therefore, spending money on the arts can be not salutary and highly risky for the countries.
Despite its drawbacks, I opine that there are various tangible advantages when the authority decides to pay fees for the growth of art. Admittedly arts including film, music, and paintings considered an effective transport to popularize the cultural image of each country. Obviously, the images of a film or a music video are mainly based on features about the culture and humans where it was taken root. As a consequence, this facilitates each nation to convey the images of their country to other foreign countries which has been one of the key factors promoting tourism and the economy of these ones. Another part to make is that this can contribute to the national budget. Arguably, when a movie or music song can have high awareness from the audience or tends to become viral on social media, its producer can reap the profits of this product eventually the government will also obtain money from the tax of this artistic product.
In conclusion, from my personal perspective, in spite of acknowledging the potential drawbacks of investing in the arts, I also this has beneficial faces which assists the nation to obtain profits especially advertise the vision of their country.
- IN SOME COUNTRIES MOST PEOPLE PREFER TO RENT THEIR HOMES RATHER THAN BUYING THEM WHAT ARE THE ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF RANTING A HOME 67
- Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spent elsewhere To what extent do you agree with this view 84
- The plans below show the site of an airport now and how it will look after redevelopment next year Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The tables below give the distribution of world population in 1950 and 2000 with an estimate of the situation in 2050 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The pictures below shows process of growing and making products from pineapples 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 96, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ity in the arts is wasteful. Instead of this people believe that this money should b...
^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...iewpoint, I partially agree with this. It is irrefutable that the downsides of ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 208, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...veloping countries. In fact, opposing to developed nations, the developing ones d...
^^
Line 2, column 508, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ocation to the arts is likely impossible even is wasteful for them. Moreover, thi...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ry and highly risky for the countries. Despite its drawbacks, I opine that ther...
^^^^
Line 3, column 204, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'effective transport'.
Suggestion: effective transport
...g film, music, and paintings considered an effective transport to popularize the cultural image of eac...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 596, Rule ID: THESE_ONES[1]
Message: This phrase is probably grammatically incorrect. Write 'these' instead.
Suggestion: these
...rs promoting tourism and the economy of these ones. Another part to make is that this can ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...from the tax of this artistic product. In conclusion, from my personal perspect...
^^
Line 4, column 184, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ficial faces which assists the nation to obtain profits especially advertise the ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, consequently, if, moreover, so, therefore, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1932.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 375.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.152 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40055868397 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88310449959 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570666666667 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 608.4 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.1992338068 49.4020404114 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.647058824 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0588235294 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.23529411765 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.01903807615 179% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276563334282 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0910803660297 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0839970349811 0.0667982634062 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176149898099 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117330476291 0.056905535591 206% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.78 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 78.4519038076 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.