Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development.
I agree that government should place a few restrictions on scientific research and development. If restrictions are not placed it might cause harm to some one be it human or an animal.
There are certain circumstances in which adopting these type of laws is neccessary like experimentation on endagered species. Although scientist are experimenting for their welfare but leaving them as be might be good for everybody's welfare. For example researching on Snow Lepords who live in lands of Siberia shows that these creatures are required to have snow and very low temperature in there ambience, but if we migrate them to different location which has hot enviroment they might suffer or even die.
Scientific research should be limited in scope of enviroment as it might cause to global warming. As global warming is increasing the glaciers in Arctic and Antartica are melting down leading to displacement of polar bears. Polar bears are also suffering cause of scientific research and development which is making them weak, malnourished as they heavily rely on fishes and other sea creatures (for there daily nourishment of proteins and other resources). Fishes and other sea creatures nearby are getting killed by polluted water, polluted air making them poisonous. Hence making creatures like polar bears and others weak and malnourished.
Government should set boundaries or limits to research and development as some experiments can violate laws like 'Animal Protection Law', some animals might get hurt in experimentation. Although there are laws which limit the use of animals in experiments. Government must try to convince scientists to make their research effective, to protect, to develop enviroment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-19 | Celestina Asantewaa | 83 | view |
| 2024-10-03 | shivamzala17 | 83 | view |
| 2024-10-03 | shivamzala17 | 75 | view |
| 2024-07-01 | MMoksha | 66 | view |
| 2024-06-29 | sefeliz | 83 | view |
- It is primarily through our identification with social groups that we define ourselves 50
- Educators should find out what students want included in the curriculum and then offer it to them 54
- Educators should find out what students want included in the curriculum and then offer it to them 50
- Educators should find out what students want included in the curriculum and then offer it to them 54
- Young people should be encouraged to pursue long term realistic goals rather than seek immediate fame and recognition Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for th 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 151, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'someone'?
Suggestion: someone
...s are not placed it might cause harm to some one be it human or an animal. There are ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 569, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...er, polluted air making them poisonous. Hence making creatures like polar bears and o...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 185, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...mals might get hurt in experimentation. Although there are laws which limit the use of a...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 33.0505617978 51% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 58.6224719101 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1446.0 2235.4752809 65% => OK
No of words: 269.0 442.535393258 61% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37546468401 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.55969084622 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02870646279 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 215.323595506 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.576208178439 0.4932671777 117% => OK
syllable_count: 452.7 704.065955056 64% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.7993878062 60.3974514979 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.230769231 118.986275619 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6923076923 23.4991977007 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.84615384615 5.21951772744 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260371432365 0.243740707755 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106913424055 0.0831039109588 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.16849714221 0.0758088955206 222% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190489356959 0.150359130593 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.16581002793 0.0667264976115 248% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 14.1392134831 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 48.8420337079 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.1639044944 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.38706741573 108% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 100.480337079 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.