Nowadays, a growing number of people with health problems are trying alternative medicines and treatments instead of visiting their usual doctor. Do you think this is a positive or a negative development?
Nowadays, there are increasingly people who are finding the other treatments or medicines to cure their illnesses. There are several problems related to the behavior that people do not visit a doctor. In my perspective, although this trend could have both positive and negative consequences, but I would agree that there are far more drawbacks.
When technology is employed in various fields, people have more options to choose if they are ill. Firstly, trying alternative medicines and treatments allow people find out the most suitable for their health conditions. For example, some people with muscular skeleton issues can apply physical treatments instead of taking medicine from doctors. Secondly, some of severe illnesses like cancer, trying new medicines might be a opportunity to save their life, because it will be no hope when just visiting their usual doctors.
On the other hand, there are various drawbacks related to these risky treatments. One of the disadvantages is that those methods could not be demonstrated in the real life with proper number of samples. It means that it would be very dangerous for health of participates who trying this new method. Another thing should be considered is that people will not be ensured when they have any problems after that. Finally, most of people who are trying these treatments will have the more serious consequences if the method fails. In the contrast, if they accept the treatment from doctor at the early stage, it could be easier to treat.
In conclusion, people with health problems should visit doctors instead of trying alternative medicines and treatments that are not demonstrated in the real life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-06 | linh allie | 89 | view |
| 2024-10-26 | hahoaan | 89 | view |
| 2024-10-04 | zanzendegi | 67 | view |
| 2024-10-04 | zanzendegi | 56 | view |
| 2024-09-01 | Zahid6400 | 67 | view |
- The chart below gives information about how families in one country spent their weekly income in 1968 and in 2018 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The chart below shows the results of a survey of people who visited four types of tourist attraction in Britain in the year 1999 78
- The diagram below shows the manufacturing process for making sugar from sugar cane Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time doing housework and households in one country between 1920 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons wher 73
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes in billions of telephone calls in the UK divided into three categories from 1995 2002 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 425, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...e cancer, trying new medicines might be a opportunity to save their life, because...
^
Line 3, column 418, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the people') or simply say ''most people''.
Suggestion: most of the people; most people
... have any problems after that. Finally, most of people who are trying these treatments will ha...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, another thing, for example, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1405.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2037037037 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68936073811 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548148148148 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 425.7 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.5315561057 49.4020404114 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 100.357142857 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2857142857 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.28571428571 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.36411321491 0.244688304435 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127874526968 0.084324248473 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102550747157 0.0667982634062 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.264208601778 0.151304729494 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0977448884453 0.056905535591 172% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.