The most important aim of science should be to improve people’s lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Human’s existence is now seen as a crucial aspect for others’ movements, including scientific advancements. While some argue that fact is undoubted, in my opinion, it is simultaneously significant to have a broader approach to the environment as an indisputable perspective which also needs the support of science while preserving human lives.
Science undeniably holds significance in terms of creating and preserving the betterment of human beings, due to the fact that the science field has originally been invested in by the intelligence of humans. The internet, for example, has been advent with the aim at facilitating the connection among individuals around the world, giving them a diverse array of readily ability to access global knowledge and to meet other human’s needs.
On the other hand, the selfishness in using science solely for our survival leads to an even faster extinction of our planet, given our direct relationship with the environment and scientific improvement serving as human’s tools in connection to the ecosystem more easily. In other words, without the existence of the surrounding environment, such as flora and fauna, any innovations and developments created by even the most prominent scientists seems nonsense. Therefore, striking to the sustainability of human lives, the advancement in the scientific field should be also navigated to environmental issues. For instance, conserving the rare animal species or reviving the appearance of greenery should also be taken into consideration of certain scientists such as biologists and environmentalists, etc.
In conclusion, while it is undeniable the most significant position of serving people in studying science, other fields of consideration in scientific care, such as surroundings, should also hold indisputable importance in regard to the overall interaction of people with the environment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-14 | trpg143 | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-12 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
- the maps below show an industrial area in the town of Norbiton and planned future development of the site 73
- the diagram below shows the process for recycling plastic bottle 61
- The maps below show an industrial area in the town of Norbiton and planned future development of the site Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The diagram below shows the manufacturing process for making sugar from sugar cane Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 808, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s biologists and environmentalists, etc. In conclusion, while it is undeniable th...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, in other words, in regard to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 26.0 8.3376753507 312% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1611.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.67253521127 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.35309452717 2.80592935109 120% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.577464788732 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 498.6 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.2975951904 153% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.3812284943 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 179.0 106.682146367 168% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.5555555556 20.7667163134 152% => OK
Discourse Markers: 16.1111111111 7.06120827912 228% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138496227229 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0546519534316 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0397676515946 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0855247518349 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0478444148809 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.1 13.0946893788 161% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 23.09 50.2224549098 46% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.7 11.3001002004 157% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.2 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.4 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.1190380762 142% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 808, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s biologists and environmentalists, etc. In conclusion, while it is undeniable th...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, in other words, in regard to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 26.0 8.3376753507 312% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1611.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.67253521127 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.35309452717 2.80592935109 120% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.577464788732 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 498.6 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.2975951904 153% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.3812284943 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 179.0 106.682146367 168% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.5555555556 20.7667163134 152% => OK
Discourse Markers: 16.1111111111 7.06120827912 228% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138496227229 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0546519534316 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0397676515946 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0855247518349 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0478444148809 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.1 13.0946893788 161% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 23.09 50.2224549098 46% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.7 11.3001002004 157% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.2 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.4 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.1190380762 142% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.