the pie charts show the electricity generated in Germany and France from all sources and renewables in the year 2009
The charts compare between Germany and France which generate electricity from all resources, including conventional thermal, nuclear, and renewables in 2009
Overall, the biggest proportion in all types of sources in Germany was conventional thermal and nuclear in France. Meanwhile, the renewables were Biomass and hydroelectric.
Moving to a detailed analysis, in 2009, the total electricity generated in Germany was 560 billion kWh. There was 59,6% of generated electricity from conventional thermal while electricity generation of nuclear power was only at 23%. Meanwhile, the percentage of renewable sources were approximately 17%; to be specific biomass and wind were at around 30%, hydroelectric and solar were under 20%, and geothermal was 0%.
Meanwhile, France had 50 billion kWh difference of total electricity generated from all types of sources with Germany. Over half of all resources power was nuclear. The figure for generated electricity from conventional thermal was about 10%. Nevertheless, over 10% of electricity generation from renewables power included hydroelectric, wind, biomass, solar, and geothermal, roughly 80%, and four last resources were lower below 11%, which Hydroelectric became the highest proportion in renewables.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-11 | susanti | 73 | view |
| 2022-07-25 | wokoma elisha | 67 | view |
| 2021-10-24 | thy thanh | 11 | view |
| 2021-07-02 | rahulchd | 90 | view |
| 2021-04-18 | dhillonsukh | 73 | view |
- Many adults nowadays prefer spending their free time playing computer games Is this a positive or negative development 61
- the maps below show an industrial area in the town of Norbiton and planned future development of the site
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- the maps below show an industrial area in the town of Norbiton and planned future development of the site
- School children today take part in work experience sessions for short periods of time instead of attending school Is this positive or negative development 56
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 441, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...st resources were lower below 11%, which Hydroelectric became the highest proport...
^^
Line 7, column 502, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e the highest proportion in renewables.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, nevertheless, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1082.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.94505494505 4.92477711251 121% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18032685862 2.65546596893 120% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.549450549451 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 326.7 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.45097560976 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 87.107333216 43.030603864 202% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 135.25 112.824112599 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.375 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.364155255699 0.215688989381 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.166846063035 0.103423049105 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110923043508 0.0843802449381 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.268977795889 0.15604864568 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105544930551 0.0819641961636 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 13.2329268293 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 61.2550243902 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.53 11.4140731707 154% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 11.4329268293 149% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 441, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...st resources were lower below 11%, which Hydroelectric became the highest proport...
^^
Line 7, column 502, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e the highest proportion in renewables.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, nevertheless, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1082.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.94505494505 4.92477711251 121% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18032685862 2.65546596893 120% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.549450549451 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 326.7 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.45097560976 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 87.107333216 43.030603864 202% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 135.25 112.824112599 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.375 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.364155255699 0.215688989381 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.166846063035 0.103423049105 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110923043508 0.0843802449381 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.268977795889 0.15604864568 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105544930551 0.0819641961636 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 13.2329268293 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 61.2550243902 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.53 11.4140731707 154% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 11.4329268293 149% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.