In the past, people used to travel to see the difference from their home country. However, the sceneries in places around the world seem similar nowadays. What are the causes of these similarities? Do you think that the advantages of this similarity outweigh the disadvantages?
In the past, looking different from our country was the goal of travel. Yet, nowadays all sceneries in sites around the world seem similar. This is because development of technology, which have negative impact like changing of origin building’s form.
The same scenery in many places in the world is caused by sophisticated technology in this era. This definitely triggers all people to imitate without modifying information from the internet as one of the advanced technologies. Most of society tries to copy hot issues on social media and then apply these ones in their country. For example, in 2020 Eiffel Tower as a background photo became a trending topic on Twitter leading to the majority of restaurants in Southeast Asia metropolitans such as Jakarta, Hanoi, and Kuala Lumpur built an imitation of the iconic tower.
Although some countries have successfully created icons of other nations, it is the beginning of changes in their architectural concept. In developing modern buildings nowadays, never have people considered nature or local ideas whereas there are huge differences in environment and culture. As proof, almost modern architecture in the city center of Bali does not have the identity of Bali dominated by Western style with box-shaped buildings that is unsuitable for Tropic Island. To find the origin culture of the city, the tourists have to visit some rural areas like Penglipuran or Jatiluwih village.
In conclusion, the growth of technology is a factor in why the sceneries in all sites look the same. Freedom to access information encourages citizens to develop their sceneries causing the loss of their ideas about local architecture.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-19 | Afdalah Harris | 78 | view |
| 2022-08-03 | timgu | 47 | view |
| 2021-08-19 | gggggggggggggggggggggg | 84 | view |
| 2021-05-03 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 89 | view |
| 2021-03-31 | daniel1984 | 84 | view |
- Research shows that business meetings discussions and training are happening online nowadays Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 56
- Large shopping malls are replacing small shops Do you think it is a positive or negative development 73
- Some people believe that it is more important to teach children the literature of their own country than other countries Do you agree or disagree 61
- Some people say that economic growth is the only way to end hunger and poverty while others say that economic growth is damaging the environment so it should be stopped Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- In many countries smoking in now illegal in public places Do you agree or disagree 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 301, Rule ID: THESE_ONES[1]
Message: This phrase is probably grammatically incorrect. Write 'these' instead.
Suggestion: these
...t issues on social media and then apply these ones in their country. For example, in 2020 ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 237, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f their ideas about local architecture.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, so, then, whereas, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1413.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29213483146 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87352579108 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.651685393258 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 454.5 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.9194045691 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.692307692 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5384615385 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.92307692308 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214013302546 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0774806369382 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0864760363865 0.0667982634062 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130102605674 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0918653569512 0.056905535591 161% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.66 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.