The table below gives information about the problems faced by children in two primary schools in 2005 and 2015.
The table compares the percentage of children who struggled with distinct educational problems in two different primary schools in the years 2005 and 2015.
It is clear that school A had larger percentages of pupils with different educational problems in all areas in both years. While school A managed to reduce numbers of pupils struggling with these problems, school B saw a significant increase in the number of children with spelling and following instructions problems.
In the year 2005, the proportion of pupils attending school A with problems with concentration in lessons and following instructions were 40% and 42% respectively. Over the following 10 years, the figures dropped to 18% for both problems. Other educational problems saw slight decreases in the proportions of pupils, ranging from 20% to 28% in 2015.
Looking at different educational problems of school B, in 2005, the children who experienced difficulties related to listening skills, verbal expression of ideas, and concentration in lessons accounted for 11%, 14%, and 15% respectively. The other problems faced by children made up all under 10%. It is noticeable that the number of students struggling with spelling and following instructions doubled, from 5% to 10%, and 6% to 12% over a period of 10 years.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-09 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
| 2023-11-09 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
| 2023-11-09 | Daniel3003 | 73 | view |
| 2023-11-09 | Daniel3003 | 73 | view |
| 2023-11-06 | Daniel3003 | 73 | view |
- The diagrams below show the site of a school in 2004 and the plan for changes to the school site in 2024 67
- The plans below show the site of an airport now and how it will look after redevelopment next year Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons 73
- The maps below show an industrial area in the town of Norbiton and planned future development of the site Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The diagram below shows the manufacturing process for making sugar from sugar cane Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 461, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd 6% to 12% over a period of 10 years.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1089.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31219512195 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0894805302 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521951219512 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 295.2 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.521427577 43.030603864 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.0 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7777777778 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.11111111111 5.23603664747 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 1.13902439024 790% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241812615093 0.215688989381 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113356906199 0.103423049105 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104535601778 0.0843802449381 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185712361927 0.15604864568 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108992094147 0.0819641961636 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.