THE GRAPH BELOW SHOWS THE SALES OF CHILDREN’S BOOKS, ADULT FICTION AND EDUCATIONAL BOOKS BETWEEN 2002 AND 2006 IN ONE COUNTRY.
Given is a graph depicting the sales by million dollars of three distinctive types of book: children's, adult fiction and educational in the four-year period stemmed from 2002.
From an overall perspective, it is readily apparent that the amount of money earned from children's book changed dramatically over 4 years. Meanwhile, the figure for educational books fluctuated inconsiderably and was the category that had the lowest income.
Considering the line graph more closely, we can obtain that in the year 2002, more than 3 million dollars was acquired by selling books for infants and students, which ranked the second among the three aforementioned book types. However, after a year, this data rose quickly by $10 millions and surpassed that of adult fiction. After 2003, the amount of sales of children's book witnessed a jump to nearly 60 million dollars in 2006 with the maintenance of the first place comparing to other two categories.
It is also worth noting that approximately 45 million dollars was the sales that adult fiction books gained in 2002, which was the largest amount of income in that year. Nevertheless, the indicator of adult fiction dropped to merely 40 million dollars in the next year and lost its first place. Furthermore, this data experienced a slight increase with exactly $40000000 in 2004, yet in the rest of the period, the gap between the figure for adult fiction and that of children's book was widened by the significant decrease of fiction books for older people with 30 million dollars in 2006 to be the book type with least earning. Additionally, from 2002 to 2005, the indicator of books for learners fluctuated lightly and stayed still with about 25 million dollars in 3 years commencing from 2002. In the year 2006, the amount of sales get by educational books suffered from an increase to reach more than 30 million dollars and surpassed that of adult fiction.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-10 | tsln7607 | 67 | view |
| 2021-05-16 | gur1040894 | 93 | view |
| 2021-03-23 | Dyor | 20 | view |
| 2021-03-12 | Pamm | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-27 | sudhir parmar | 56 | view |
- Demand for food is increasing worldwide What is the cause of this What measures can the international community take to meet this demand 67
- Parents usually mothers stay at home to look after their families People believe that for this they should receive a salary from the government Do you agree or disagree and why 78
- Nowadays a growing number of people with health problems are trying alternative medicines and treatments instead of visiting their usual doctor Do you think this is a positive or a negative development Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant 67
- In many countries plastic shopping bags are the main source of rubbish They cause water and land pollution and so they should be banned To what extend do you agree with this statement 78
- Some people think students should study the science of food and how to prepare it Other think students should spend time on more important subjects Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 608, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'with the least'.
Suggestion: with the least
...ion dollars in 2006 to be the book type with least earning. Additionally, from 2002 to 200...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 3.15609756098 349% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 15.0 5.60731707317 268% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 33.7804878049 163% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1586.0 965.302439024 164% => OK
No of words: 318.0 196.424390244 162% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98742138365 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 3.73543355544 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68215951586 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 106.607317073 146% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.490566037736 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 456.3 283.868780488 161% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.8475944641 43.030603864 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.181818182 112.824112599 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.9090909091 22.9334400587 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.355450894554 0.215688989381 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1588062185 0.103423049105 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0701463537001 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.243413234126 0.15604864568 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0617837517936 0.0819641961636 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 40.7170731707 172% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.