Many people believe the government should spend money on faster public transport. Others think that money should be spent on different aspects of public transportation, such as cost reduction and environment conservation. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Nowadays, people hold differing views about which of two steps the local authorities should do: investing money to rise the speed of mass transit system or pouring financial support to others aspects of public transportation such as environment protection or cut down on public transport prices, to have a better public vehicles system in the future. From my own perspective, I firmly hold the view that public spending should be expended on both approaches because they are of equal significance.
On one hand, I understand why the state should offer financial packages for increasing the speed of public modes of travel in order to encourage citizens to use public transportation more frequently. As a matter of fact, bus is the most popular public mean of transport in the world; nevertheless, a factor that deters passengers from travelling by the mass transit system is that they move slowly in comparison with other vehicles. Additionally, they are prone to be caught on traffic congestions, particularly in cities, due to their large size. As a result, bus passengers might run a risk of showing up late at school or at work. However, were the government to allocate their fundings more on BRT system, Bus Rapid Transit, the move between bus stops could be faster thanks to the private routes only for that type of bus. Hence, more individuals would rely more on public means of transport.
On the other hand, I believe that the policy makers should make supplementary allocation to other aspects of public transport, chief of which is making the mass transit system be environmentally-friendly. In fact, most environmentalists are well aware of the importance of environment reservation and they are conscious that traditional buses run on fossil fuel, which releases a noticeable amount of toxic fumes to the atmosphere, and contributes significantly to the air pollution. Consequently, people may opt for greener vehicles such as riding their bicycles or walking on foot, yet those means of travel are either time-consuming or inconvenient. If the government subsidizes their investment on improving the availability of electric buses and coaches, much less harmful emissions can be produced, so the number of bus and coach passengers may soar sharply.
In conclusion, various aspects of the mass transit system, including its speed and environmental sustainability, are requiring extra funding from the authorities because both of them play indispensable roles in improving the popularity of public transport among people.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-13 | tsln7607 | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-27 | Sahil Rekhi | 74 | view |
- Some people believe that studying at university or college is the best route to a successful career while others believe that it is better to go to get a job straight after school Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- A rise in the standard of living in a country often only seems to benefit cities rather than rural areas What problems can this cause How might these problem be reduced 78
- Many people nowadays spend a large part of their free time using a smartphone What do you think are the reasons for this Do you think this is a positive or negative development 78
- There is too much noise in many public places in cities What are the causes of this problem What can be done to solve the problem 73
- In many countries around the world rural people are moving to cities so the population in the countryside is decreasing Do you think this is a positive or a negative development 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 321, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'vehicles'' or 'vehicle's'?
Suggestion: vehicles'; vehicle's
...ansport prices, to have a better public vehicles system in the future. From my own persp...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 588, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this means' or 'those means'?
Suggestion: this means; those means
... their bicycles or walking on foot, yet those means of travel are either time-consuming or ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, hence, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, well, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a matter of fact, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 41.998997996 152% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2136.0 1615.20841683 132% => OK
No of words: 403.0 315.596192385 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30024813896 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48049772903 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23340010966 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 176.041082164 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558312655087 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 655.2 506.74238477 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.2975951904 153% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 76.3397110244 49.4020404114 155% => OK
Chars per sentence: 164.307692308 106.682146367 154% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.0 20.7667163134 149% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.6923076923 7.06120827912 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.306629301045 0.244688304435 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101715173249 0.084324248473 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0900810374413 0.0667982634062 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191382734326 0.151304729494 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101460972161 0.056905535591 178% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.0 13.0946893788 145% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.01 50.2224549098 80% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 9.78957915832 184% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.1190380762 142% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.