Many people believe that scientific research should be carried out and controlled by governments rather than private companies. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In the context that science has become one of the top-tier concerns of each nation, there is a school of thought holding that scientific projects should be conducted and governed by national institutions rather than private enterprises. From my perspective, I suppose that it is equally crucial for both private businesses and governments to share this responsibility to bring about betterment in science.
On the one hand, there are some reasons why national authorities should administrate all science exploration activities to ensure society’s welfare and national security. First and foremost, with a community-oriented mission, governments always prioritize citizen's benefits when researching while private companies may ignore strict standards about quality and infrastructure to save costs. To illustrate, some firms produce low-quality medicine without vigorous examination before launching to the market just to gain more profit resulting in detrimental impacts on patients' health. Secondly, if private organizations are entitled to carry out some scientific fields that directly affect national security without any government supervision, they may create opportunities for terrorists and criminals. To cite an example, a company discovering a chemical that can make biological weapons may sell it to an antisocial party posing a serious threat to society.
On the other hand, while the government should regulate scientific studies for the reasons mentioned above, private companies are better candidates for directly conducting and investing in such research. Firstly, unlike authorities that have many aspects to take care of, independent firms often concentrate on only one or two fields, which helps to yield more auspicious results. For instance, instead of being involved in developing solar energy equipment, authorities should assign the implementation to a technology company that already has highly specialized engineers in this area which can create more successful results. Secondly, scientific research requires much money to be conducted so independent corporations should share this financial burden with governments. More government money invested in scientific programs could lead to an imbalance in national spending which negatively affect other important sectors such as education and health care.
In conclusion, many people advocate the view that governments should be the key organizers and administrators of science exploration. While I partly agree with this opinion because it would ensure social well-being and national safety, I still believe that it is more effective if private companies take part in scientific studies and share costs with the authorities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-18 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2023-11-15 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2023-11-15 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2023-11-08 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2023-11-08 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
- The line graph shows the number of cell phone subscribers in a particular city by gender Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make the comparison where relevant
- In many countries children are becoming overweight and unhealthy Some people think that the government should have the responsibility To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Nowadays celebrities earn more money than politicians What are the reasons for this Is it a positive or negative development 89
- Nowadays celebrities are more famous for their glamour and wealth than for their achievement and this is a bad example to adolescents To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- It is a natural process of animal species to become extinct e g dinosaurs dodos etc There is no reason why people should stop this from happening Do you agree or disagree 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 323, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ally crucial for both private businesses and governments to share this responsibi...
^^
Line 2, column 567, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'patients'' or 'patient's'?
Suggestion: patients'; patient's
...fit resulting in detrimental impacts on patients health. Secondly, if private organizati...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, well, while, for instance, i suppose, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2311.0 1615.20841683 143% => OK
No of words: 393.0 315.596192385 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.88040712468 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45244063426 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13717447033 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 236.0 176.041082164 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.600508905852 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 725.4 506.74238477 143% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 34.2181626196 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 165.071428571 106.682146367 155% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0714285714 20.7667163134 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26592694274 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0880956539219 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0589268195234 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166064975231 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0354687953629 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.3 13.0946893788 155% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.14 50.2224549098 52% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 11.3001002004 147% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.12 12.4159519038 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.05 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 78.4519038076 159% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.