Since travelling abroad became relatively inexpensive, more countries opened their doors for foreign tourists. Is it a positive or negative trend? Give your opinion and include relevant examples.
In recent times, going on a vacation in a country is no longer a luxury; therefore, a large number of nations welcome more vacationers. From my point of view, this trend benefits advantageously to both social and economic aspects.
On the one hand, international tourism might boost national economy in many ways. Thanks to the low-cost airlines, individuals with tight budget can still afford a trip abroad, usually the neighboring countries to visit tourist destinations. As a matter of fact, they spend a certain amount of money on food, accommodations, souvenirs or tourist activities. Consequently, local people can earn their living by providing the visitors with goods and services, and the holiday-makers may help boost the local economy. Hence, the local residents would improve their standard of living. To exemplify, Ha Long coastal city has a bundle of sandy beaches that has welcomed millions of tourists across the globe. Before the tourist era, most residents lived in poverty; nevertheless, this tourism city is developing at a record pace.
On the other hand, not only does international tourism influence positively on the national budget, it also facilitates the cultural integration between foreigners and the locals. In fact, when visitors come into contact with the local dwellers, they might gain deeper understanding about various cultural aspects such as language, customs, traditions, the way of living and behaviors. As a result, the local inhabitants can broaden cultural horizon through learning how different people from other cultural backgrounds think and behave. Therefore, such cultural contacts would gradually instill the sense of understanding and sympathy between two sides. For instance, Vietnamese previously did not have any idea about the American cultural identity. However, the tourist attractions in Vietnam have served thousands of tourists from the USA. Many local inhabitants now, can understand the American jokes, which is one significant part of their oral culture. In other words, international tourism is conducive to cultural exchange.
In conclusion, current affordability of travelling abroad is why many nations are now boosting their tourism industry, and I wholeheartedly believe that this development is socially and economically beneficial to one nation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-17 | tsln7607 | 89 | view |
| 2020-11-30 | Jango Jo | 87 | view |
| 2020-11-30 | Jango Jo | 67 | view |
| 2020-08-24 | Gmpnineteen | 66 | view |
| 2018-12-09 | mostafa jahangiri | 87 | view |
- Some people believe that violence in the media such as in television programs and films directly results in violent behavior To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- In many countries plastic shopping bags are the main source of rubbish They cause water and land pollution and so they should be banned To what extend do you agree with this statement 78
- Some children spend hours every day on their smartphones Why is this the case Do you think this is a positive or a negative development Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 78
- Some people think students should study the science of food and how to prepare it Other think students should spend time on more important subjects Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- People in many countries are spending less time with their family What are the reasons and effects of this 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 85, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...untry is no longer a luxury; therefore, a large number of nations welcome more vacationers. From ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, hence, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, still, therefore, well, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a matter of fact, as a result, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1970.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 351.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.61253561254 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05454827698 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618233618234 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 611.1 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.1164444009 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.444444444 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1666666667 7.06120827912 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.105759951573 0.244688304435 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0316276753998 0.084324248473 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0249109878965 0.0667982634062 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0656193913737 0.151304729494 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0118880423485 0.056905535591 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.71 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.