In some countries, the number of people choosing to live by themselves is increasing rapidly in recent years. Why is this the case? Is this a positive or negative development?
Recent years have witnessed the rise in the number of single-person accommodations in some nations. The trend toward living alone is attributable to several reasons, and from my opinion, this has a detrimental effect on individuals.
One the one hand, there are some justifications why people are increasingly living in solitary life, chief of which is they do not want to interrupt others’ daily routine. In fact, each person has a differing lifestyle, which is maintained for some years. When sharing their home with others, they may have to change their long-lasting habits. In other words, cohabiting with other members in the house can cause inconvenience and even discomfort. To exemplify, a large proportion of the young have a routine of staying up late at night and having a lie-in in the morning, while parents usually sleep much earlier. Therefore, is a couple of old and young people try to live together, conflicts centering on sleeping hours has a high possibility to happen. For this reason, more and more individuals tend not to share their place of resident with others.
On the other hand, despite some plausible arguments about this single way of living, I firmly hold the view that this trend has a deleterious influence on individuals. One of the most convincing rationales is that they have to cope with health problems by themselves. That is because no matter how healthy and strong people are, they still suffer from health deterioration in their life. By way of illustration, when people who live alone have flu-like symptoms, they must go to the pharmacy for the medical support by their own. If the symptoms become more serious without care from family or roommates, their life might be put at risk. In this way, the decision of living in solitary leads people to life-threatening situations. This reinforces the view that single lifestyle might be disadvantageous to one’s health.
In conclusion, the choice of living on their own stems from a wide range of reasons, the major of these is related to conflicts in lifestyle, and I believe that this trend does more harm than good.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-02 | tsln7607 | 84 | view |
| 2020-10-09 | kchocielts | 56 | view |
| 2020-04-05 | kynguyenax | 56 | view |
| 2020-04-05 | kynguyenax | 56 | view |
| 2020-04-05 | kynguyenax | 56 | view |
- In some countries the number of people choosing to live by themselves is increasing rapidly in recent years Why is this the case Is this a positive or negative development 84
- In many countries plastic shopping bags are the main source of rubbish They cause water and land pollution and so they should be banned To what extend do you agree with this statement 78
- Some people believe the purpose of education should be to help the individual to become useful to the society while others believe it should help individuals to achieve their ambitions Discuss both sides and give your opinion 84
- The use of mobile phone is as antisocial as smoking Smoking is banned in certain places so mobile phone should be banned like smoking To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- People in many countries are spending less time with their family What are the reasons and effects of this 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, so, still, therefore, while, in conclusion, in fact, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 63.0 41.998997996 150% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1764.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 353.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99716713881 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88140002672 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57223796034 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 542.7 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.2146693483 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.764705882 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7647058824 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88235294118 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200172572443 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0649102348405 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0569678959695 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129289866231 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0424893358843 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.