Government should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extend, do you agree or disagree
Transportation plays an important role in boosting the tendency of development and globalization. Additionally, the public also raises concern about pollution which is caused by personal vehicles. I believe that focusing on improving the railway system rather than roads may help humans take advantage of both economic development and environmental protection.
To begin with, road transportation is the first means in human history and also plays an essential role in our life. However, nowadays, many disadvantages appear, especially in developing countries like countries in South East Asia. To cite an example, Vietnam traffic is quite chaotic and crazy with a lot of personal vehicles that leads to traffic congestion, wasting time and money. Moreover, it causes not only air pollution due to greenhouse gas but also sound pollution. Although, the government and authorities have been working hard together to come up with the idea to upgrade road infrastructure and awareness of travelers, it is a hurdle task because the city population is growing more and more while the land for expanding or building new roads is limited.
In contrast, developed countries own wide ranges of transportation means, especially rail transportation. In the past, trains required fossil fuel for running causing pollution too. However, thanks to the development of science, many state-of-the-art technologies have been applied to this sector. Experts believe that the high-speed train system is a key of Japanese mystery after World War II while China, nowadays, owns the longest high-speed system. Many countries both developing and developed also join this tendency. High-speed train transportation still has many potential for development because of its advantages. Firstly, it is the most convenient means of transportation when compared to the others. Although traveling by plane is the fastest one, its procedures such as check-in, check-out… cost a lot of time. Additionally, flights are often delayed due to safety problems and detrimental weather. Secondly, in terms of safety, traveling by train is very outstanding. Aforementioned, the high-speed system of Japan, called Shinkansen system, since its beginning in the 1960s, has never experienced any regrettable accidents that caused loss of life. Meanwhile, when it comes to road transportation means, everyday there are many reports about disasters around the world. Another reason supporting the idea of enhancing railways is due to significant economic profits. Except for saving time for individuals and society, the governments seem to pay more to build new systems, but in the long term, the expense for keeping its action and upgrading is less than other means. Last but not least, it also helps us protect our environment. As I mentioned before, the noble train system uses the-state-of-the-art technologies that require renewable energy such as solar, wind electricity emitting less greenhouse gasses. Furthermore, the more people taking trains for transportation, the less personal vehicles they use. It eases pressure for road transportation and protects our environment, too.
In conclusion, to deal with transportation problems is not an easy task. By concentrating on public means such as investing, upgrading and building the train system, we can make life more convenient while saving our planet.
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 78
- It is important for children to learn the difference between right and wrong at an early age Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion What sort of punishment should parents and t 67
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future such as those related to science and technology Discuss both these views and 56
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian households The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use Summarize the information by selecting and importing the main features and make compar 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1220, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
... it comes to road transportation means, everyday there are many reports about disasters ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1681, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...onment. As I mentioned before, the noble train system uses the-state-of-the-art t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, while, except for, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 41.998997996 155% => OK
Nominalization: 26.0 8.3376753507 312% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2864.0 1615.20841683 177% => OK
No of words: 512.0 315.596192385 162% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.59375 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.75682846001 4.20363070211 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22700464207 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 289.0 176.041082164 164% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564453125 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 862.2 506.74238477 170% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 16.0721442886 174% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.8593301812 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.285714286 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2857142857 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.92857142857 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.068309550013 0.244688304435 28% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0166478092389 0.084324248473 20% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.032303005265 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0494033282997 0.151304729494 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0358382468716 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 146.0 78.4519038076 186% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.