Video records are a better way to learn about the way other people in the world live rather than written documents. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is widely believed that video records are a superior way to study the way other people in the world live rather than written documents. From my point of view, I support this opinion.
It goes without saying that video records are good due to the particular reason of how its liveliness can be useful. Learning with documents in the form of writing is just a ton of words in a scroll or a paper, this actively demonstrate that the activity is only reading and results in difficulties attempting to imagine the pictures. However, video recordings contain both pictures and sounds, allowing us to overcome this problem. For instance, research from 2009 shows that learning without video records causes a lower percent of understanding, which is 64% when compared to 88% of understanding when they study with video records.
Not stopping there, video recordings are better since it is easier to store, this actively demonstrates that it is a lot more simple and straight-forward to use and have access to. With written documents, it can easily get lost or demolished in various ways such as making it wet and dissolve, making it troublesome to preserve and create some problems when it is used to study worldwide. With video recordings, however, this is not the case since the same recording can be sent to multiple devices. For instance, a recording of 68 languages was recorded by 100 different devices by NASA to mix into a video to send to space in an attempt to make contact with possible living beings in space, which is proof that video recordings are practically undestroyable and can even be used in space, an environment without oxygen and many more.
To sum up every piece of information that has been stated so far, video records are a superior way to study the way other people in the world live rather than written documents due to how it is move lively and how it is easier to preserve.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-20 | kevann | 73 | view |
| 2023-11-20 | kevann | 67 | view |
| 2023-10-21 | Huyenlbg87 | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-26 | dominhthanh | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-03 | hieu13092006 | 89 | view |
- Some people who have been in prison become good citizens later and it is often argued that these are the best people to talk to teenagers about the dangers of committing a crime To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- The graph and table below show the average monthly temperatures and the average number of hours of sunshine per year in three major cities Summarize the information by selectin and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The graph below shows a typical American and a Japanese office Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and comparisons where relevant 78
- The line graph shows the percentage of people accessing news from 4 sources 78
- The map shows how coastal land develops into a coastal park 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 446, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to overcome this problem. For instance, research from 2009 shows that learning w...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, for instance, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1573.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75226586103 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72872391942 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537764350453 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 496.8 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.2975951904 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 76.8896386318 49.4020404114 156% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.0 106.682146367 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.0909090909 20.7667163134 145% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.45454545455 7.06120827912 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.312735837084 0.244688304435 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125515473525 0.084324248473 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.141660143041 0.0667982634062 212% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.246213613832 0.151304729494 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.121659685198 0.056905535591 214% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 50.2224549098 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.1190380762 138% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 446, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to overcome this problem. For instance, research from 2009 shows that learning w...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, for instance, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1573.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75226586103 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72872391942 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537764350453 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 496.8 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.2975951904 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 76.8896386318 49.4020404114 156% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.0 106.682146367 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.0909090909 20.7667163134 145% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.45454545455 7.06120827912 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.312735837084 0.244688304435 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125515473525 0.084324248473 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.141660143041 0.0667982634062 212% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.246213613832 0.151304729494 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.121659685198 0.056905535591 214% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 50.2224549098 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.1190380762 138% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.