Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In my opinion it is a very hard question to give a simple answer: Yes, I agree, rich countries should help to poorer countries. First, I would differentiate between the country and government of this country. There are very rich countries with poorer populace, for example Russia, Bolivia and many countries of Africa. Those people need help too. Second, we must recognize that some rich countries owe their resources to poor countries. Colonial past and slave trade really helped to strengthen the modern economies of rich countries. It would be nice if these countries left schools, universities, hospitals, industry and electricity production systems. Third, financial help does not need to go to support dictators and terrorists. All resources should be spent on fighting hunger, poverty of ordinary citizens and lack of education. I believe that if all the money that goes towards the militarization of the world is used to fight poverty, then the problem will be solved. We need new approaches to food production. Extraction and purification of drinking water remains an important problem.
There is another way to beat poor countries. Society must abandon countries as an outdated institution. There are no countries, therefore there are no poor countries. It will be hard. But equality and freedom are the only way for us to fight poverty on the planet. The sooner we abandon religious, racial and national delusions, the faster society will switch to solving such important problems as poverty and hunger. We must understand that the enemies of the people will do everything to prevent this.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-06 | Thai Tran | 87 | view |
| 2024-01-04 | honguyenlily | 73 | view |
| 2023-11-29 | Alexanderpopov | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-02 | tracywu | 84 | view |
| 2023-10-31 | thaokim2003 | 89 | view |
- The bar chart below describes some changes about the percentage of people were born in Australia and who were born outside Australia living in urban rural and town between 1995 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature 56
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, really, second, so, then, therefore, third, for example, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1345.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19305019305 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83376641724 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.602316602317 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 405.0 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.2975951904 64% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.8924987726 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 70.7894736842 106.682146367 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.6315789474 20.7667163134 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.52631578947 7.06120827912 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 4.38176352705 46% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283077727827 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0745231224603 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0736767475683 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20394174847 0.151304729494 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0959569903561 0.056905535591 169% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.0946893788 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.28 50.2224549098 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.23 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.1190380762 71% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.