Every year several languages die out. Some people think that this is not important because life will be easier if there are fewer languages in the world.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Recently, extinction of languages has become a global concern. According to some, living with a fewer languages is better. In my opinion, it is not true and the life can get better with different languages.
Languages carries the integral part of a culture’s identity in every country. Each language indicates a complex system of grammar, vocabulary, and linguistic structures. Hence, preventing the loss of the language is very important because not only do the next generation forget and unable to be familiar with their ancestors but also, its diapering may completely affect the national history. The nations should teach their own languages to new generation and expand them to their neighbors which can tackle dying out their mother tongue language.
Having multi-languages can also benefit communication, expression and job opportunities, so it is necessary to respect the variety of languages and trying to save them for the future instead of focusing on one international language which can be devoid of cultural and spatial features. Although it is easy for the young people to learn new language, this takes time for older people. A person who know more than one language has this opportunities to employ in job markets and international trades. This promotes cross-cultural understanding. The education system should notice teach different international languages to their students. With this students can be familiar with different cultures and traditional, which the most point is prevent from dying languages.
In conclusion, it is not true that with fewer languages people can live easier. All nations and countries should try to save their native language because with this they have saved their culture. This is obvious that I disagree with this belief.
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981 1991 and 2001 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- the pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive the table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make 73
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010
- The chart below shows the number of households in the US by their annual income in 2007 2011 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The table and charts below give information on the police budget for 2017 and 2018 in one area of Britain The table shows where the money came from and the charts show how it was distributed Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main fe 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 430, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...son who know more than one language has this opportunities to employ in job markets ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 643, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ional languages to their students. With this students can be familiar with different...
^^^^
Line 3, column 738, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'prevented'.
Suggestion: prevented
...nd traditional, which the most point is prevent from dying languages. In concl...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, may, so, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1508.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40501792115 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96894076526 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5770609319 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 62.4707118877 49.4020404114 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.25 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4375 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.6875 7.06120827912 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.344758093546 0.244688304435 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122316764342 0.084324248473 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0573972411645 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220825547914 0.151304729494 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0471667756281 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.8 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.