The table describes the changes of people who went for international travel in 1990, 1995, 2000 and 2005.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given table illustrates the different numbers of residents who traveled overseas in various locations within the 4 separate years: 1990, 1995, 2000 and 2005.
Overall, the total number of overseas travelers increased throughout the time. It is also noticeable that Europe is the continent with the most travelers, and the Middle East was the region with the fewest travelers.
In the year 1990, the residents traveling worldwide from Europe was more than half of the total number. America travelers stood on the second place, at 80.5 million. The number of travelers from Asia and the Pacific was in the third position, at over 60 million. African and Middle Eastern travelers were over 18 and under 10 million respectively.
In the 3 remaining years, the figures for travelers in all the regions rose dramatically. Europe still held the top position with over 400 million in the final year. The travelers from Middle East were at the lowest level, at only more than 15 million despite a steady rise over the years. American overseas tourists reached over 113 million although the number fell by 6 million after the third year. Africa and Asia and the Pacific experienced a stable growth to over 28 and over 135 million respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-08 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 78 | view |
| 2018-11-17 | ziahasan | 80 | view |
- In many countries fast food is becoming cheaper and more available Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvanatages 84
- The graph gives information about the number of people in Australia who used Chinese Arabic Italian or Greek as their first mother tongue Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The charts below show the percentage of electricity consumed by different sectors in Eastern Australia in 2007 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- Topic People continue to recommit crimes even after being penalized for their wrongdoings Why do you think this happens How can crime be stopped 84
- The chart shows the symptoms of stress reported by survey participants in the month before the survey took place 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, second, so, still, third, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1036.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00483091787 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55070633868 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565217391304 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 308.7 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.0075863828 43.030603864 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.3333333333 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.25 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.41666666667 5.23603664747 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.096159431924 0.215688989381 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.042878187102 0.103423049105 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0558795471776 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0824394479372 0.15604864568 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0757731280416 0.0819641961636 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.42 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.