The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean Island between 2010 and 2017.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph illustrates the number of people who traveled to Caribbean Island in two distinct groups from 2010 to 2017.
It is obvious that, totally there was an upward trend in tourists visiting throughout the period. The people who stay on cruise ships increased annually except in 2012. The number of visitors in cruise ships was more than island in 2017.
As can be seen, visitors who staying on cruise ships after that increased about 0.25 million in 2011 decreased and recovered again in 2013 and then has a slight raise around 1.5 million from 0.5 until 2017. Whereas visitors who staying on island did not change until 2011 and then increase slightly around 0.75 million and then has a stable situation for three consecutive years between 2013 and 2015. The number of tourists decreased approximately 0.25 million in 2016 and in last year raised. Totally people who visit Caribbean Island have upward trend during the period.
As a result, there were a thoroughly surge trend by considering two groups and the number of people that stay on cruise ships was more than visitors staying on island.
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA are in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The table and charts below give information on the police budget for 2017 and 2018 in one area of Britain The table shows where the money came from and the charts show how it was distributed Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main fe 73
- In some cultures children are often told that they can achieve anything if they try hard enough What are the advantages and disadvantages of giving children this message 56
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade labelled coffee and banannas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 549, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'trended'.
Suggestion: trended
... who visit Caribbean Island have upward trend during the period. As a result, there ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 25, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('thoroughly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('surge') instead of another adjective.
...ng the period. As a result, there were a thoroughly surge trend by considering two groups and the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
then, whereas, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 923.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90957446809 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32433418963 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.526595744681 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 253.8 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.9293870878 43.030603864 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.555555556 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8888888889 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.88888888889 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145784084802 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0764966608308 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0571426869967 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109529956763 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0558617390255 0.0819641961636 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.98 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.