An increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment. Why is this the case, and what solutions are possible?
In today’s society, there is a marked increase in the consumption of consumer goods due to the break in population. In addition, the natural environment has seen considerable degradation in recent years. While it is true that consumer goods production has an undeniable relationship with the environment, some solutions are possible to solve this issue.
Nowadays, in the stress, we can easily find that the petrol cars have gradually been replaced by electric cars. From the customer’s perspective, people think that using automatic vehicles has a positive environmental effect. However, minerals for electric car batteries like cobalt are very rare and if not disposed of properly, they could contaminate water resources, which are home to many aquatic animals. Moreover, by using this unclear water source for a long time, people's health is threatened by many chronic diseases such as cancer or renal impairment. The second reason is plastic is an essential material in production processes, also in packaging and transportation. In some research, about 90% of plastic materials are discarded directly into the environment, not through any waste treatment processes. An increase in goods production would raise this number, which means more garbage or plastic bags would be discarded and pose a detrimental effect on the environment, also the house of humans and many species.
Some solutions could be taken to solve this environmental problem. In terms of vehicles, companies should research and apply material that has a longer lifespan or degrades properly when they are discarded in the environment. Moreover, the government should minimize plastic consumption by elevating the tax for plastic higher than other environmentally friendly such as paper.
In conclusion, the production process effects directly the environment is obvious and increasing taxes is a part of solutions.
- The diagrams show changes to a medical centre from 2008 to 2010 60
- Whether or not someone achieves their aims is mostly by a question of luck To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- The diagram shows the components of a neuron and how it works 11
- Whether or not someone achieves their aims is mostly by a question of luck To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- The diagram shows the components of a neuron and how it works
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, moreover, second, so, while, in addition, in conclusion, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1610.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.55172413793 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07182354329 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610344827586 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 498.6 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.704855898 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.0 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7142857143 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.78571428571 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211470690653 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0732485967332 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0834153729487 0.0667982634062 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152833883509 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.118244069508 0.056905535591 208% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.91 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.