Extreme sports such as sky diving and skiing are very dangerous and should be banned. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view?
In this modern era, there's been a noticeable uptick in the popularity of extreme sports, sparking discussions about whether the associated risks should be taken into account and if regulations are necessary. While I agree that activities like skydiving and bungee jumping can be perilous for participants, I don't believe banning them is the solution, as it could dampen the enthusiasm of athletes.
On one hand, it's undeniable that certain extreme sports, such as parachuting and skiing, come with inherent dangers. For instance, a lack of experience in handling safety equipment, like parachutes or jumpsuits, can lead to tragic accidents, as seen recently in Quang Ninh, Vietnam, where a skydiver lost his life due to mishandling of his parachute. Additionally, individuals with pre-existing mental conditions like acrophobia may risk losing consciousness when confronted with extreme heights during these activities, further increasing the potential for accidents.
On the other hand, I argue against imposing bans, especially considering the growing number of thrill-seekers eager to participate in such sports. It's important to preserve the spirit of sportsmanship and allow enthusiasts to engage in activities that ignite their passion. Moreover, rumors about the unavailability or inadequacy of safety equipment are often unfounded, as licensed agencies are legally obligated to ensure the safety of participants by thoroughly inspecting and maintaining equipment.
In conclusion, while it's true that extreme sports carry significant risks to participants, I maintain that outright prohibition is not the answer, as it would stifle the sporting spirit. Instead, measures should be taken to enhance safety standards and promote responsible participation in these exhilarating activities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-06 | Tường Vân | 84 | view |
| 2024-04-06 | Tường Vân | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-24 | Ngoc4120 | 56 | view |
| 2023-02-10 | tranlequihoang | 73 | view |
| 2022-12-12 | lariarhydes | 73 | view |
- The charts below give information about the way in which water was used in different countries in 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment What are the causes of this 84
- Some people believe that developments in the field of artificial intelligence will have a positive impact on our lives in the near future Others by contrast are worried that we are not prepared for a world in which computers are more intelligent than huma 89
- The maps below show the Happy Valley Shopping Center in 1982 and 2012 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- In some cities people are choosing cars instead of bicycles while in other cities riding bikes are replacing cars Why is this the case Which development do you think is better 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 21, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: there's
In this modern era, theres been a noticeable uptick in the popular...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 309, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ing can be perilous for participants, I dont believe banning them is the solution, a...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, moreover, so, thus, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1540.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.85551330798 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25149529601 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.67680608365 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 42.0343906819 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.0 106.682146367 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.1 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146315720326 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0529246901278 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0397529630146 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0840994516857 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0436980179585 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.3 13.0946893788 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 50.2224549098 56% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.0 12.4159519038 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.93 8.58950901804 127% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.