In any field — business, politics, education, government — those in power should be required to step down after five years
The statement claims that power should be required step down after five years in the fields of business, polities, education and government, I agree with this statement insofar as step down after five years make more accountable to the people. It will create opportunities for the freshers. Step down also more likely help to decrease the individual autonomy in the field. And it will also help to reduce corruption. However, stay long term in power increase the network and increase sustainability that can affect positively rather than step down after 5 years. Additionally, long term government has good forein relationship rather than new government that can help in economic prosperity.
One compelling argument in favor on my position is step down after 5 years will increase accountability to the people and accountability can create the good and healthy environment for the field. For example, in politics, when leader know that after five years, he will lost his power. This will evoke more accountability. This will create a good environment in politics and increase democratic values.
Another argument is step down after five years will decrease corruption and decrease individual autonomy. In politics, education or government, long term power will more likely increase corruption as they haven't any pressure for accountability. It will create the individual autonomy in the field and this will increase many illigeal activities and corruption. For instance, when a particular government are in power for a long term, then the government has create sufficient control in the law and judgement sector and his follower and supporter can do anything. Law is not working for them and the antigonastic follower are more likely be harashed. In many country in the world, there are government are in power illigally. Step down after five years can decrease this corruption and individual autonomy.
Moreover, step down after five years will create more opportunities for the freshers to gain knowledge and lead for the future as they are the main power and energy source for the nation.
However, long term power are more likely help to build a strong networking with the neighbour. This is more important for any kind of field. In politics, when a leader are in power for a long term then he can know better the real condition of the people and he can make the long term plan for sustainability. In government, long term in power is necessary to make the economic propresity and good relationship with the other countries. A plan can not be implemented in five years so a long term power is necessary to implement the plan.
In conclusion, step down after five years is more necessary for because reduce the corruption , individual autonomy and increases accountability and make opportunities for freshers. But in some particular field, there are long term power is necessary for sustainabilities. In education, business, long term power is more important rather than step down after five years but in the vast cases, for others field like politics, stepping down after five years is very necessary because long term power can make any human more rude, robust and thirsty for power.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-18 | Zahid6400 | 50 | view |
| 2024-04-16 | guozhishan | 50 | view |
| 2024-01-04 | jenas | 66 | view |
| 2023-12-28 | Mirza Raquib | 70 | view |
| 2023-09-20 | yfli | 70 | view |
- It is important for everyone including young people to save money for their future To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 84
- The flow chart below shows the recycling procedure of glass bottles Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The charts below show the percentage of five kinds of books sold by a bookseller between 1972 and 2012 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main points and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The charts below show the number of working hours per week in the industrial sector in four European countries in 2002 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The three pie charts below show the coffee production and consumption of coffee and where the profit goes around the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 270, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'lose'
Suggestion: lose
...der know that after five years, he will lost his power. This will evoke more account...
^^^^
Line 3, column 205, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: haven't
...more likely increase corruption as they havent any pressure for accountability. It wil...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 458, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'created'.
Suggestion: created
...or a long term, then the government has create sufficient control in the law and judge...
^^^^^^
Line 6, column 94, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...essary for because reduce the corruption , individual autonomy and increases accou...
^^
Line 6, column 227, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'termed'.
Suggestion: termed
...n some particular field, there are long term power is necessary for sustainabilities...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, moreover, so, then, for example, for instance, in conclusion, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 12.4196629213 169% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 14.8657303371 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 58.6224719101 104% => OK
Nominalization: 28.0 12.9106741573 217% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2673.0 2235.4752809 120% => OK
No of words: 521.0 442.535393258 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13051823417 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.77759609229 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89590104492 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 215.323595506 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.347408829175 0.4932671777 70% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 850.5 704.065955056 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.3669352733 60.3974514979 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.807692308 118.986275619 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0384615385 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.42307692308 5.21951772744 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 10.2758426966 175% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.343782187598 0.243740707755 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113856280412 0.0831039109588 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101055030554 0.0758088955206 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219859613733 0.150359130593 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0886180527366 0.0667264976115 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.14 8.38706741573 85% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 100.480337079 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.