The graphs below show the different reasons of two groups of students to choose
Dorrifod University. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main
features and make comparisons where relevant.
"The provided pie charts illustrate and compare data on five different reasons that influenced two age groups (18-24 and 25 and over) to choose Dorrifod University. Overall, it is evident that 'close to home' is the primary reason that led the highest number of students in both groups to choose Dorrifod University.
Examining the data set for the group aged 18-24 in more detail, it is clear that the majority of students selected Dorrifod University because it is close to their home (36%) and due to the courses offered (35%). Additionally, 14% of students chose the university based on the campus facilities. A small minority of students selected Dorrifod University due to the reputation of the teaching staff (2%), industry-related factors (4%), and the opportunity to study abroad as part of the course (9%).
Turning to the age group of 25 and over, it is evident that the highest percentage of students chose Dorrifod University because it is close to home, which is 3% more than the 18-24 age group. Another significant reason for selecting the university is the courses offered, accounting for 24% of the total students, which is 11% less than the 18-24 age group. However, a minority of students (3% and 2%) chose Dorrifod University due to the opportunity to study abroad and the campus facilities, respectively."
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-14 | Zahid6400 | 61 | view |
| 2024-07-14 | Zahid6400 | 67 | view |
| 2024-07-07 | Sajib Ahamed | 73 | view |
| 2024-07-07 | Sajib Ahamed | 67 | view |
| 2024-06-26 | Zahid6400 | 67 | view |
- The graphs below show the different reasons of two groups of students to choose Dorrifod University Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The bar chart below shows estimated world illiteracy rates by region and by gender for the last year Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- Some people think that we should invent a new language for international communication do benefits of this outweigh the problems 61
- The effectiveness of a country s leaders is best measured by examining the well being of that country s citizens 50
- The best way to learn about other cultures is to work in multinational organizations Do you agree or disagree 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1108.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 220.0 196.424390244 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03636363636 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95573402666 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.468181818182 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 349.2 283.868780488 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 36.7831483155 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.5 112.824112599 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5 22.9334400587 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.875 5.23603664747 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237198258434 0.215688989381 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121433624438 0.103423049105 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0281261122363 0.0843802449381 33% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181957251496 0.15604864568 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0250634965247 0.0819641961636 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 61.2550243902 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.